These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10394212)

  • 1. Validity of the computer-assisted cephalometric growth prognosis VTO (Visual Treatment Objective) according to Ricketts.
    Toepel-Sievers C; Fischer-Brandies H
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 10394212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dental VTO: an analysis of orthodontic tooth movement.
    McLaughlin RP; Bennett JC
    J Clin Orthod; 1999 Jul; 33(7):394-403. PubMed ID: 10535022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the variable anchorage straightwire technique using Ricketts' growth prediction.
    Parikakis KA; Moberg S; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18832190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of two VTO methods.
    Sample LB; Sadowsky PL; Bradley E
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9770097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.
    Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of computer-aided prediction in soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.
    Zhang X; Mei L; Yan X; Wei J; Li Y; Li H; Li Z; Zheng W; Li Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 31784016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Predicting of growth tendency with cephalometry. Cephalometric research comparing orthodontic treatment cases with four premolar extraction].
    Szabó GT; Herényi G; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2007 Feb; 100(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17444131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The variability and reliability of two maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques. Part II.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):463-71. PubMed ID: 7977186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of computer-generated prediction tracing.
    Cangialosi TJ; Chung JM; Elliott DF; Meistrell ME
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 7486242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 8540481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of mandibular incisor extraction on anterior occlusion in adults with Class III malocclusion and reduced overbite.
    Faerovig E; Zachrisson BU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 9971920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of vertical facial and dentoalveolar changes using panoramic radiography.
    Nohadani N; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 18209215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial morphology and adolescent facial growth in Pierre Robin sequence.
    Suri S; Ross RB; Tompson BD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):763-74. PubMed ID: 20685531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of growth impairment and orthodontic results in adult patients with clefts of palate and unilateral clefts of lip, palate and alveolus.
    Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 38(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10783444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Teleradiographic study of maxillary brachygnatism treated by an orthopedic method of extraoral traction].
    Verdon P
    Orthod Fr; 1971; 42():429-51. PubMed ID: 5293029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Histologic and teleradiographic study of bone growth].
    Hureau G
    Orthod Fr; 1966; 37():369-86. PubMed ID: 5229878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid maxillary expansion. A study of the long-term effects.
    Velázquez P; Benito E; Bravo LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 8638577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.