These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10394212)

  • 21. Rapid maxillary expansion. A study of the long-term effects.
    Velázquez P; Benito E; Bravo LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 8638577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Residual craniofacial growth: A cephalometric study of 50 cases.
    Oualalou Y; Antouri MA; Pujol A; Zaoui F; Azaroual MF
    Int Orthod; 2016 Dec; 14(4):438-448. PubMed ID: 27856378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Cephalometric estimation of growth and treatment according to Ricketts].
    Langlade M; Picaud M
    Orthod Fr; 1970; 41():399-415. PubMed ID: 5292341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Siqueira DF; de Almeira RR; Janson G; Brandão AG; Coelho Filho CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of overjet and dentoskeletal relations in unilateral cleft lip and palate before and during puberty.
    Smahel Z; Müllerová Z; Skvarilová B; Stránská P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jan; 31(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 8130239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of Ricketts' long-range growth prediction in Turkish children.
    Kocadereli I; Telli AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 May; 115(5):515-20. PubMed ID: 10229883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric variables to predict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment.
    Ghiz MA; Ngan P; Gunel E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 15775944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evidence of correction of open bite malocclusion using active vertical corrector treatment.
    Bazzucchi A; Hans MG; Nelson S; Powers M; Parker S
    Semin Orthod; 1999 Jun; 5(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 10530284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 1. Cephalometrics.
    Fogle LL; Southard KA; Southard TE; Casko JS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 15067261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Fundamental elements of maxillofacial orthodontics in the treatment of sagittal maxillo-mandibular disproportions].
    Fleury JE; Deboest D; Maffre N; Lacour M; Deneuville O; Assaad C
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1994; 95(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8036410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis.
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 May; 125(5):571-81. PubMed ID: 15127026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Significance of mandibular growth axis for treatment planning].
    Rakosi T
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1972 Jul; 33(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 4509554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the soft tissue profile.
    Katsaros C; Ripplinger B; Högel A; Berg R
    J Orofac Orthop; 1996 Dec; 57(6):354-65. PubMed ID: 8986054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Application of the visualization of treatment objective (VTO) in a case of Class II using Ricketts cephalometric analysis].
    Angelini V; Palattella E; Gurrera F; Massi C
    Mondo Ortod; 1984; 9(6):35-46. PubMed ID: 6598831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment of Class III problems begins with differential diagnosis of anterior crossbites.
    Ngan P; Hu AM; Fields HW
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(6):386-95. PubMed ID: 9348603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of orthodontic treatment changes as measured from study casts and cephalometric radiographs.
    Jones ML
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 1911699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1--Skeletal changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Feb; 17(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2310738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The validity of two methods of mandibular superimposition: a comparison with tantalum implants.
    Springate SD; Jones AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 9517716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.