185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10394535)
1. The Task Force report: comprehensible forest or unknown beetles?
Ross JW
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 10394535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An ongoing conversation: the Task Force report and bioethics consultation.
Aulisio MP; Arnold RM; Youngner SJ
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11645165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Moving the conversation forward.
Aulisio MP; Arnold RM; Youngner SJ
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 10394538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical ethics consultations: some reflections on the report of the SHHV-SBC.
Pellegrino ED
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 10394533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics consultants: could they do better?
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 10394534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The application of the Task Force report in rural and frontier settings.
Moss AH
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 10394537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What are the goals of ethics consultation? A consensus statement.
Fletcher JC; Siegler M
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 8889887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New report rejects accrediting of those who provide ethics consultation services.
Phillips DF
JAMA; 1999 Jun; 281(21):1976. PubMed ID: 10359370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who ate the apple? A commentary on the Core Competencies report.
King NM
HEC Forum; 1999 Jun; 11(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 11184853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Woodstock of bioethics.
Marker R
Hum Life Rev; 1995; 21(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 11653007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond case consultation: an expanded model for organizational ethics.
Pentz RD
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10394536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating outcomes in ethics consultation research.
Fox E; Arnold RM
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 8889888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Role responsibilities in clinical bioethics: the dialectic of consultation -- comments on the case presented by Barbara Springer Edwards.
Dagi TF
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 11642823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Why ethicists should stop writing cases.
Chambers T
J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 11127634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating ethics consultation: framing the questions.
Tulsky JA; Fox E
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 8889885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation research and the future of ethics consultation.
Fox E; Tulsky JA
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 8889890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Obstacles and opportunities in the design of ethics consultation evaluation.
Tulsky JA; Stocking CB
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 8889889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Consultations in clinical ethics--issues and questions in 27 cases.
La Puma J
West J Med; 1987 May; 146(5):633-7. PubMed ID: 3590772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is ethics consultation an elegant distraction?
Moreno JD
HEC Forum; 1996 Jan; 8(1):12-21; discussion 22-8. PubMed ID: 10156357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics consultation: the Hospital for Sick Children initiative [Toronto, Ontario].
Baylis FE
HEC Forum; 1991; 3(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 10115139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
