These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10394708)

  • 1. Similarity and categorisation: neuropsychological evidence for a dissociation in explicit categorisation tasks.
    Roberson D; Davidoff J; Braisby N
    Cognition; 1999 May; 71(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 10394708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revealing the multidimensional mental representations of natural objects underlying human similarity judgements.
    Hebart MN; Zheng CY; Pereira F; Baker CI
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Nov; 4(11):1173-1185. PubMed ID: 33046861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mapping emotion category boundaries using a visual expectation paradigm.
    Cheal JL; Rutherford MD
    Perception; 2010; 39(11):1514-25. PubMed ID: 21313948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task.
    Boot I; Pecher D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):942-54. PubMed ID: 19731189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of acquired color category effects.
    Clifford A; Franklin A; Holmes A; Drivonikou VG; Özgen E; Davies IR
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Oct; 80(1):126-43. PubMed ID: 22722021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is overall similarity classification less effortful than single-dimension classification?
    Wills AJ; Milton F; Longmore CA; Hester S; Robinson J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 22897383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of categorical labels on similarity judgments: a critical evaluation of a critical analysis: comment on Noles and Gelman (2012).
    Sloutsky VM; Fisher AV
    Dev Psychol; 2012 May; 48(3):897-900; discussion 901-6. PubMed ID: 22545855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective preservation of naming from description and the "restricted preverbal message".
    Druks J; Shallice T
    Brain Lang; 2000 Apr; 72(2):100-28. PubMed ID: 10722783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetries in stimulus comparisons by monkey and man.
    Op de Beeck H; Wagemans J; Vogels R
    Curr Biol; 2003 Oct; 13(20):1803-8. PubMed ID: 14561406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Category learning deficits in Parkinson's disease.
    Ashby FG; Noble S; Filoteo JV; Waldron EM; Ell SW
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Jan; 17(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 12597080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial training with difficult items does not facilitate category learning.
    Edmunds C; Wills AJ; Milton F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):151-167. PubMed ID: 28847234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of perceptual information in word access.
    Richter T; Zwaan RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 19424906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biological bases of colour categorisation: From goldfish to the human brain.
    Siuda-Krzywicka K; Boros M; Bartolomeo P; Witzel C
    Cortex; 2019 Sep; 118():82-106. PubMed ID: 31151746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial expression megamix: tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition.
    Young AW; Rowland D; Calder AJ; Etcoff NL; Seth A; Perrett DI
    Cognition; 1997 Jun; 63(3):271-313. PubMed ID: 9265872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorical sensitivity to color differences.
    Witzel C; Gegenfurtner KR
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):1. PubMed ID: 23732118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Category-specific versus modality-specific aphasia for colours: a review of the pioneer case studies.
    De Vreese LP
    Int J Neurosci; 1988 Dec; 43(3-4):195-206. PubMed ID: 2468627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The perceptual effects of learning object categories that predict perceptual goals.
    Van Gulick AE; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1307-20. PubMed ID: 24820671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of categorical labels on similarity judgments: a critical analysis of similarity-based approaches.
    Noles NS; Gelman SA
    Dev Psychol; 2012 May; 48(3):890-6. PubMed ID: 22059447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relational learning in honeybees (Apis mellifera): Oddity and nonoddity discrimination.
    Muszynski NM; Couvillon PA
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():81-93. PubMed ID: 25746438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination and generalization along a simple dimension: peak shift and rule-governed responding.
    Livesey EJ; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):554-65. PubMed ID: 19839707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.