These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Effect of loading on the vibration characteristics of thin magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler inserts. Trenter SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD J Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1308-15. PubMed ID: 14584863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasonic scaler tip performance under various load conditions. Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 30(10):876-81. PubMed ID: 14629574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vibration characteristics of ultrasonic scalers assessed with scanning laser vibrometry. Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD J Dent; 2002 May; 30(4):147-51. PubMed ID: 12450721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study. Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. Drisko CL; Cochran DL; Blieden T; Bouwsma OJ; Cohen RE; Damoulis P; Fine JB; Greenstein G; Hinrichs J; Somerman MJ; Iacono V; Genco RJ; J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1792-801. PubMed ID: 11128930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits. Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro effectiveness of a newly-designed ultrasonic scaler tip for furcation areas. Oda S; Ishikawa I J Periodontol; 1989 Nov; 60(11):634-9. PubMed ID: 2689626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study. Arabaci T; Cicek Y; Dilsiz A; Erdogan İY; Kose O; Kizildağ A Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23033943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one? Drisko CH Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diamond-coated sonic scaler tip. Part I: Oscillation pattern of different sonic scaler inserts. Kocher T; Plagmann HC Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Aug; 17(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 9497729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal. Gartenmann SJ; Thurnheer T; Attin T; Schmidlin PR Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 27193939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study. Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Yagi H; Matsumoto K; Ito K J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17760537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces. Mann M; Parmar D; Walmsley AD; Lea SC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]