138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10397928)
1. Tissue colonization from implantable biomaterials with low numbers of bacteria.
Merritt K; Hitchins VM; Neale AR
J Biomed Mater Res; 1999 Mar; 44(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 10397928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tissue reaction to suture materials in infected surgical wounds--a histopathologic evaluation.
Varma S; Johnson LW; Ferguson HL; Lumb WV
Am J Vet Res; 1981 Apr; 42(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 6277211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do multifilament alloplastic meshes increase the infection rate? Analysis of the polymeric surface, the bacteria adherence, and the in vivo consequences in a rat model.
Klinge U; Junge K; Spellerberg B; Piroth C; Klosterhalfen B; Schumpelick V
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(6):765-71. PubMed ID: 12418022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Further studies with polyglycolic acid (Dexon) and other sutures in infected experimental wounds.
Varma S; Lumb WV; Johnson LW; Ferguson HL
Am J Vet Res; 1981 Apr; 42(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 6277212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The choice of a suture to close abdominal incisions.
Bucknall TE; Teare L; Ellis H
Eur Surg Res; 1983; 15(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 6303791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbial adherence on various intraoral suture materials in patients undergoing dental surgery.
Banche G; Roana J; Mandras N; Amasio M; Gallesio C; Allizond V; Angeretti A; Tullio V; Cuffini AM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1503-7. PubMed ID: 17656275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of monofilament sutures and triclosan coating to protect against surgical site infections in spinal surgery: a laboratory-based study.
Fawi HMT; Papastergiou P; Khan F; Hart A; Coleman NP
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Oct; 33(7):3051-3058. PubMed ID: 37000241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro S. epidermidis and S. aureus adherence to composite and lightweight polypropylene grafts.
Aydinuraz K; Ağalar C; Ağalar F; Ceken S; Duruyürek N; Vural T
J Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 157(1):e79-86. PubMed ID: 19592038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo and in vitro antibacterial efficacy of PDS plus (polidioxanone with triclosan) suture.
Ming X; Rothenburger S; Nichols MM
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2008 Aug; 9(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 18687027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Suture Type Influence Bacterial Retention and Biofilm Formation After Irrigation in a Mouse Model?
Markel DC; Bergum C; Wu B; Bou-Akl T; Ren W
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):116-126. PubMed ID: 30794234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal suture materials for contaminated gastrointestinal surgery: does infection influence the decrease of the tensile strength of sutures?
Tanaka Y; Sadahiro S; Ishikawa K; Suzuki T; Kamijo A; Tazume S; Yasuda M
Surg Today; 2012 Dec; 42(12):1170-5. PubMed ID: 22218873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decreased Bacterial Adherence, Biofilm Formation, and Tissue Reactivity of Barbed Monofilament Suture in an In Vivo Contaminated Wound Model.
Morris MR; Bergum C; Jackson N; Markel DC
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1272-1279. PubMed ID: 28065625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of an experimental model to evaluate infection resistance of meshes in abdominal wall surgery.
Pérez-Tanoira R; Lévano-Linares C; Celdrán-Uriarte Á; Isea-Peña MC; De Molina MS; García-Vasquez C; Esteban-Moreno J
J Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 206(2):435-441. PubMed ID: 27884340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enclosure of bacteria within capillary multifilament sutures as protection against leukocytes.
Osterberg B
Acta Chir Scand; 1983; 149(7):663-8. PubMed ID: 6650080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In Vivo and In Vitro Anti-Bacterial Efficacy of Absorbable Barbed Polydioxanone Monofilament Tissue Control Device with Triclosan
Bhende S; Burkley D; Nawrocki J
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2018; 19(4):430-437. PubMed ID: 29624479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An experimental study of the relationship between synergistic wound sepsis and suture materials.
McGeehan D; Hunt D; Chaudhuri A; Rutter P
Br J Surg; 1980 Sep; 67(9):636-8. PubMed ID: 6253005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of biofilm contribution to bacterial colonisation in an experimental model of foreign body infection by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Francois P; Tu Quoc PH; Bisognano C; Kelley WL; Lew DP; Schrenzel J; Cramton SE; Götz F; Vaudaux P
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2003 Mar; 35(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 12628549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tissue integration and biomechanical behaviour of contaminated experimental polypropylene and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants.
Bellón JM; García-Carranza A; García-Honduvilla N; Carrera-San Martín A; Buján J
Br J Surg; 2004 Apr; 91(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 15048754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial adhesion to suture material in a contaminated wound model: Comparison of monofilament, braided, and barbed sutures.
Dhom J; Bloes DA; Peschel A; Hofmann UK
J Orthop Res; 2017 Apr; 35(4):925-933. PubMed ID: 27208547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [In vitro study of Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesiveness to suture materials].
Arciola CR; Buscaroli S; Rocca M; Farinetti A; Fini M; Manfrini M; Giardino R
G Chir; 1990 Mar; 11(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 2223484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
