BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10398085)

  • 1. Improving the prognostic value of histopathological grading and clinical staging in renal cell carcinomas by means of computer-assisted microscopy.
    François C; Decaestecker C; De Lathouwer O; Moreno C; Peltier A; Roumeguere T; Danguy A; Pasteels JL; Wespes E; Salmon I; van Velthoven R; Kiss R
    J Pathol; 1999 Feb; 187(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 10398085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The computer-assisted microscope analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei linked to a supervised learning algorithm as an aid to prognosis assessment in invasive transitional bladder cell carcinomas.
    Decaestecker C; Petein M; van Velthoven R; Janssen T; Raviv G; Pasteels JL; Schulman C; Van Ham P; Kiss R
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1996 May; 10(3):263-80. PubMed ID: 8798287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
    Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification strategies for the grading of renal cell carcinomas, based on nuclear morphometry and densitometry.
    François C; Decaestecker C; Petein M; van Ham P; Peltier A; Pasteels JL; Danguy A; Salmon I; van Velthoven R; Kiss R
    J Pathol; 1997 Oct; 183(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 9390025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era.
    Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC
    Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of the decision tree technique and image cytometry to characterize aggressiveness in World Health Organization (WHO) grade II superficial transitional cell carcinomas of the bladder.
    Decaestecker C; van Velthoven R; Petein M; Janssen T; Salmon I; Pasteels JL; van Ham P; Schulman C; Kiss R
    J Pathol; 1996 Mar; 178(3):274-83. PubMed ID: 8778332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume as a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma.
    Soda T; Fujikawa K; Ito T; Sasaki M; Nishio Y; Miyakawa M
    Lab Invest; 1999 Jul; 79(7):859-67. PubMed ID: 10418826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA ploidy is a valuable predictor for prognosis of patients with resected renal cell carcinoma.
    Abou-Rebyeh H; Borgmann V; Nagel R; Al-Abadi H
    Cancer; 2001 Nov; 92(9):2280-5. PubMed ID: 11745282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
    Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Morphological possibilities for objectification of the prognosis for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast].
    Theissig F; Haroske G; Dimmer V; Kunze KD; Meyer W
    Zentralbl Pathol; 1991; 137(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 1718409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Young age is independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival of low-stage clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
    Jung EJ; Lee HJ; Kwak C; Ku JH; Moon KC
    Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 18950844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction of the cytological grading, the nuclear area, the DNA index and the DNA histogram type in the setting up of a score for ductal breast carcinoma.
    Budel V; Merle S; Gasperin P; Collet JF; De Maublanc MA; Kiss R
    Anticancer Res; 1994; 14(6B):2845-51. PubMed ID: 7532932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of DNA content and nucleomorphometric features with World Health Organization grading of meningiomas.
    Grunewald JP; Röhl FW; Kirches E; Dietzmann K
    Mod Pathol; 1998 Feb; 11(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 9504694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Usefulness of new schemes to group Fuhrman grades in clinical practice for clear cell renal tumour].
    Morán E; Rogel R; Soto A; Ruiz-Cerdá JL; Budía A; Salom JV; Jiménez-Cruz JF
    Actas Urol Esp; 2012 Jun; 36(6):352-8. PubMed ID: 22266258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Renal cell carcinoma: assessment of key pathologic prognostic parameters and patient characteristics in 47,909 cases using the National Cancer Data Base.
    Nese N; Paner GP; Mallin K; Ritchey J; Stewart A; Amin MB
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Feb; 13(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19118775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
    Wagner B; Patard JJ; Méjean A; Bensalah K; Verhoest G; Zigeuner R; Ficarra V; Tostain J; Mulders P; Chautard D; Descotes JL; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Prayer-Galetti T; Cindolo L; Valéri A; Meyer N; Jacqmin D; Lang H
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 18692951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic significance of common preoperative laboratory variables in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
    Lee SE; Byun SS; Han JH; Han BK; Hong SK
    BJU Int; 2006 Dec; 98(6):1228-32. PubMed ID: 17034508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.