These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10398287)

  • 1. Testing for centre effects in multi-centre survival studies: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed and random effects tests.
    Andersen PK; Klein JP; Zhang MJ
    Stat Med; 1999 Jun; 18(12):1489-500. PubMed ID: 10398287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating covariate-by-centre interaction in survival data.
    Biard L; Labopin M; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):920-932. PubMed ID: 27166409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Permutation tests for centre effect on survival endpoints with application in an acute myeloid leukaemia multicentre study.
    Biard L; Porcher R; Resche-Rigon M
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(17):3047-57. PubMed ID: 24676752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysing multicentre competing risks data with a mixed proportional hazards model for the subdistribution.
    Katsahian S; Resche-Rigon M; Chevret S; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4267-78. PubMed ID: 16960919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating and testing for center effects in competing risks.
    Katsahian S; Boudreau C
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1608-17. PubMed ID: 21341296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term survivor model with bivariate random effects: applications to bone marrow transplant and carcinoma study data.
    Lai X; Yau KK
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(27):5692-708. PubMed ID: 18712761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On graphical tests for proportionality of hazards in two samples.
    Sahoo S; Sengupta D
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):942-56. PubMed ID: 26522814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing methods to estimate treatment effects on a continuous outcome in multicentre randomized controlled trials: a simulation study.
    Chu R; Thabane L; Ma J; Holbrook A; Pullenayegum E; Devereaux PJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():21. PubMed ID: 21338524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidence bands for comparison of transition probabilities in a Markov chain model.
    Dabrowska DM; Ho WT
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2000 Mar; 6(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 10763558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for change-point in the covariate effects based on the Cox regression model.
    Lee CY; Chen X; Lam KF
    Stat Med; 2020 May; 39(10):1473-1488. PubMed ID: 32034921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of various estimators of a treatment difference for a multi-centre clinical trial.
    Jones B; Teather D; Wang J; Lewis JA
    Stat Med; 1998 Aug 15-30; 17(15-16):1767-77; discussion 1799-800. PubMed ID: 9749446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of centre on outcome of bone-marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia. Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
    Frassoni F; Labopin M; Powles R; Mary JY; Arcese W; Bacigalupo A; Bunjes D; Gluckman E; Ruutu T; Schaefer UW; Sierra J; Vernant JP; Willemze R; de Witte T; Gorin NC
    Lancet; 2000 Apr; 355(9213):1393-8. PubMed ID: 10791522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Covariate adjustment for non-parametric tests for censored survival data.
    Li Z
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1843-53. PubMed ID: 11406845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On proportional hazards assumption under the random effects models.
    Xu R; Gamst A
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2007 Sep; 13(3):317-32. PubMed ID: 17638076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Monte Carlo approach for change-point detection in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Liu M; Lu W; Shao Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3894-909. PubMed ID: 18254131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A version of the EM algorithm for proportional hazard model with random effects.
    Abrahantes JC; Burzykowski T
    Biom J; 2005 Dec; 47(6):847-62. PubMed ID: 16450857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Average Hazard Ratio - A Good Effect Measure for Time-to-event Endpoints when the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?
    Rauch G; Brannath W; Brückner M; Kieser M
    Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):89-100. PubMed ID: 29719915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A nonparametric test for Markovianity in the illness-death model.
    Rodríguez-Girondo M; de Uña-Álvarez J
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4416-27. PubMed ID: 22975898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unobserved covariates in the two-sample comparison of survival times: a maximum efficiency robust test.
    Broët P; Moreau T; Lellouch J; Asselain B
    Stat Med; 1999 Jul; 18(14):1791-800; discussion 1801. PubMed ID: 10407249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.
    Gayat E; Resche-Rigon M; Mary JY; Porcher R
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 22411785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.