These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10398326)

  • 21. [Testimony of the psychiatric expert from the viewpoint of the criminal judge].
    Schmitt B
    Arch Kriminol; 1996; 198(1-2):38-54. PubMed ID: 8967830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
    Bolechała F
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mentally disordered offenders in Sweden.
    Lidberg L; Belfrage H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 1786418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Court experts, assessors and the public interest.
    Freckelton I
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 8(2):161-88. PubMed ID: 3957522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fitness and competency issues in Canadian criminal courts: elucidating the standards for mental health professionals.
    Whittemore KE; Ogloff JR
    Can J Psychiatry; 1994 May; 39(4):198-210. PubMed ID: 8044726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry from the legal viewpoint].
    Schreiber HL
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):626-30; discussion 631. PubMed ID: 9064936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The insanity defense: five years of research (1993-1997).
    Lymburner JA; Roesch R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1999; 22(3-4):213-40. PubMed ID: 10457921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
    Dolan B
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14(2 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 23570119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fitness to stand trial in Canada in light of the recent Criminal Code amendments.
    Davis S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 7995689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of Canadian Criminal Code changes on remands and assessments of fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility in British Columbia.
    Roesch R; Ogloff JR; Hart SD; Dempster RJ; Zapf PA; Whittemore KE
    Can J Psychiatry; 1997 Jun; 42(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 9220115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mental disorder and crime.
    Taylor PJ
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S31-6. PubMed ID: 16575813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Insanity: making law in the absence of evidence.
    Finkel NJ
    Med Law; 1992; 11(5-6):383-404. PubMed ID: 1484462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethics and the expert witness.
    Schultz-Ross RA
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Apr; 44(4):388-9; discussion 390-1. PubMed ID: 8462951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
    Dolan B
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Difference between the cognitive and control ability and the responsibility in forensic psychiatry evaluation].
    Li XW; Gao BL; Hu F; Wu C; Zhang H; Guan YJ; Lai W; Li Y; Wang Y; Wu DL; Cao XL
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 29(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 24350541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten.
    Allnutt S; Samuels A; O'driscoll C
    Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dr Rogers' 'insanity detector' and the admissibility of novel scientific evidence.
    Goldstein RL
    Med Law; 1992; 11(5-6):441-7. PubMed ID: 1484466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.