These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10398329)

  • 21. Analysis of concordance between conclusions of forensic psychiatric evaluation and court decisions after 2005 Criminal Code Amendment in a Taiwan psychiatric hospital.
    Yang TW; Yu JM; Pan CH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 54():148-154. PubMed ID: 28743408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: an analysis of 894 pretrial referrals.
    Warren JI; Fitch WL; Dietz PE; Rosenfeld BD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 2039849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do tests predict malingering in defendants with mental retardation?
    Hayes JS; Hale DB; Gouvier WD
    J Psychol; 1997 Sep; 131(5):575-6. PubMed ID: 9333654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The insanity defense: five years of research (1993-1997).
    Lymburner JA; Roesch R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1999; 22(3-4):213-40. PubMed ID: 10457921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Forensic assessment instruments: Their reliability and applicability to criminal forensic issues.
    Rogers R; Tazi KY; Drogin EY
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(5):415-431. PubMed ID: 36934388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Iatrogenesis and malingering of multiple personality disorder in the forensic evaluation of homicide defendants.
    Coons PM
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1991 Sep; 14(3):757-68. PubMed ID: 1946034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
    Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mental defenses and posttraumatic stress disorder: assessment of criminal intent.
    Sparr LF
    J Trauma Stress; 1996 Jul; 9(3):405-25. PubMed ID: 8827646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The application of evaluation tools for criminal responsibility in forensic psychiatric expertise].
    Fu PX; Wang J; Shi TT; Hu JN; Zhu MX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 26(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 20707283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Criminal responsibility evaluations: Benchmarking in different countries.
    Pouls C; Jeandarme I; Al-Taiar H; Bradford J; Canton W; Kristiansson M; Thibaut F; Verreyt V; Konrad N
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 81():101775. PubMed ID: 35066422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.
    Rendell JA; Huss MT; Jensen ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 20014145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The insanity defense: a difficult necessity.
    McGrath JJ
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 3967874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Crime-related amnesia: real or feigned?].
    Giger P; Merten T; Merckelbach H
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2012 Jul; 80(7):368-81. PubMed ID: 21678231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
    Bolechała F
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: a known-groups design.
    Sellbom M; Toomey JA; Wygant DB; Kucharski LT; Duncan S
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 20230148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The ALI test for insanity: a re-examination.
    Miller GH
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 6850104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of the SADS diagnostic interview in evaluating legal insanity.
    Rogers R; Thatcher A; Cavanaugh JL
    J Clin Psychol; 1984 Nov; 40(6):1537-41. PubMed ID: 6511977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.