These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10398388)

  • 41. Computer-assisted instruction versus traditional lecture for medical student teaching of dermatology morphology: a randomized control trial.
    Jenkins S; Goel R; Morrell DS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 18499299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Learning anatomy enhances spatial ability.
    Vorstenbosch MA; Klaassen TP; Donders AR; Kooloos JG; Bolhuis SM; Laan RF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 23349122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Interactive large-group teaching in a dermatology course.
    Ochsendorf FR; Boehncke WH; Sommerlad M; Kaufmann R
    Med Teach; 2006 Dec; 28(8):697-701. PubMed ID: 17594580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Teaching of anatomy in a problem-based curriculum at the Arabian Gulf University: the new face of the museum.
    Ganguly PK; Chakravarty M; Latif NA; Osman M; Abu-Hijleh M
    Clin Anat; 2003 May; 16(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 12673822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Stereoscopic anatomy: evaluation of a new teaching system in human gross anatomy.
    Prentice ED; Metcalf WK; Quinn TH; Sharp JG; Jensen RH; Holyoke EA
    J Med Educ; 1977 Sep; 52(9):758-63. PubMed ID: 69712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model.
    Nicholson DT; Chalk C; Funnell WR; Daniel SJ
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1081-7. PubMed ID: 17054617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Undergraduate coursework in anatomy as a predictor of performance: comparison between students taking a medical gross anatomy course of average length and a course shortened by curriculum reform.
    Peterson CA; Tucker RP
    Clin Anat; 2005 Oct; 18(7):540-7. PubMed ID: 16015636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Student views on the introduction of anatomy teaching packages into clinical attachments.
    Dawson AG; Bruce SA; Heys SD; Stewart IJ
    Clin Anat; 2009 Mar; 22(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 19031397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Student performance and perceptions of a lecture-based course compared with the same course utilizing group discussion.
    Lake DA
    Phys Ther; 2001 Mar; 81(3):896-902. PubMed ID: 11268154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Student views on the effective teaching of physical examination skills: a qualitative study.
    Martens MJ; Duvivier RJ; van Dalen J; Verwijnen GM; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 19161490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparison of an interactive computer-based method with a conventional reading approach for learning pelvic anatomy.
    Corton MM; McIntire DD; Wai CY; Ling FW; Wendel GD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1438-43. PubMed ID: 16996462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of the radiographic cephalometry learning process by a learning virtual object.
    Silveira HL; Gomes MJ; Silveira HE; Dalla-Bona RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 19577160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Small group discussion followed by presentation as a revision exercise at the end of a teaching module in biochemistry.
    Bobby Z; Koner BC; Sen SK; Renuka P; Nandakumar DN; Nandeesha H; Das V; Goswami K; Sathiamoorthy R
    Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 15115233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Undergraduate musculoskeletal examination teaching by trained patient educators--a comparison with doctor-led teaching.
    Raj N; Badcock LJ; Brown GA; Deighton CM; O'Reilly SC
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 Nov; 45(11):1404-8. PubMed ID: 16613915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: personal dissection versus peer teaching.
    Johnson JH
    Clin Anat; 2002 Jan; 15(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 11835543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Development of an experimental paradigm in which to examine human learning using two computer-based formats.
    Hoffman HM; Colt HG; Haas A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():187-91. PubMed ID: 11317737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Practical training on porcine hearts enhances students' knowledge of human cardiac anatomy.
    Musumeci G; Loreto C; Mazzone V; Szychlinska MA; Castrogiovanni P; Castorina S
    Ann Anat; 2014 May; 196(2-3):92-9. PubMed ID: 24657148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Students' evaluation on a two-stage anatomy curriculum.
    Leung KK; Lue BH; Lu KS; Huang TS
    Med Teach; 2006 Mar; 28(2):e59-63. PubMed ID: 16707286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Team-based learning using an audience response system: an innovative method of teaching diagnosis to undergraduate dental students.
    Pileggi R; O'Neill PN
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1182-8. PubMed ID: 18923099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Critical care orientation: a comparison of two teaching methods.
    Cunningham JL
    Heart Lung; 1988 Sep; 17(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 3417459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.