These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10398963)

  • 1. Cerebral blood flow measurement by dynamic contrast MRI using singular value decomposition with an adaptive threshold.
    Liu HL; Pu Y; Liu Y; Nickerson L; Andrews T; Fox PT; Gao JH
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 Jul; 42(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 10398963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of regional tracer delay on CBF in healthy subjects measured with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with 15O-PET.
    Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Ishigame K; Ito H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2005; 4(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16127251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of echo time variation on perfusion assessment using dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging at 3 tesla.
    Thilmann O; Larsson EM; Björkman-Burtscher IM; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Sep; 22(7):929-35. PubMed ID: 15288133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced data based on singular value decomposition optimized by generalized cross validation.
    Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Miyazaki S
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2004; 3(4):165-75. PubMed ID: 16093635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of deconvolution analysis based on singular value decomposition for quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Murase K; Shinohara M; Yamazaki Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Dec; 46(12):3147-59. PubMed ID: 11768497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perfusion quantification by model-free arterial spin labeling using nonlinear stochastic regularization deconvolution.
    Ahlgren A; Wirestam R; Petersen ET; Ståhlberg F; Knutsson L
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Nov; 70(5):1470-80. PubMed ID: 23281031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cerebral blood flow estimation from perfusion-weighted MRI using FT-based MMSE filtering method.
    Sakoglu U; Sood R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Apr; 26(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 18158225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model applied to quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Shinohara M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Jul; 2(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 16210825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study.
    Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative cerebral blood flow measurement with dynamic perfusion CT using the vascular-pixel elimination method: comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography.
    Kudo K; Terae S; Katoh C; Oka M; Shiga T; Tamaki N; Miyasaka K
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Mar; 24(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 12637292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cerebral perfusion mapping using a robust and efficient method for deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced images.
    Koh TS; Tan CK; Cheong LH; Lim CC
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):643-53. PubMed ID: 16682234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RF excitation profiles with FAIR: impact of truncation of the arterial input function on quantitative perfusion.
    Lipton ML; Branch CA; Hrabe J; Lewis DP; Helpern JA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Feb; 13(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 11169826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling.
    Alsop DC; Detre JA
    Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):410-6. PubMed ID: 9680569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement of BOLD-contrast sensitivity by single-shot multi-echo functional MR imaging.
    Posse S; Wiese S; Gembris D; Mathiak K; Kessler C; Grosse-Ruyken ML; Elghahwagi B; Richards T; Dager SR; Kiselev VG
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 Jul; 42(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 10398954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference-based maximum upslope: a CBF quantification method without using arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
    Kimura T; Kusahara H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2009; 8(3):107-20. PubMed ID: 19783874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Echo-planar imaging of the brain].
    Brüning R; Weber J; Wu RH; Kwong KK; Hennig J; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 1995 Dec; 35(12):902-10. PubMed ID: 8584633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wavelet-based noise reduction for improved deconvolution of time-series data in dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI.
    Wirestam R; Ståhlberg F
    MAGMA; 2005 Jul; 18(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 15887036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advantages of frequency-domain modeling in dynamic-susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance cerebral blood flow quantification.
    Chen JJ; Smith MR; Frayne R
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Mar; 53(3):700-7. PubMed ID: 15723395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DSC perfusion MRI-Quantification and reduction of systematic errors arising in areas of reduced cerebral blood flow.
    Carpenter TK; Armitage PA; Bastin ME; Wardlaw JM
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jun; 55(6):1342-9. PubMed ID: 16683256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
    Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.