These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10399198)

  • 21. CRM2DIM: A SAS macro for implementing the dual-agent Bayesian continual reassessment method.
    Bayar MA; Ivanova A; Le Teuff G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 176():211-223. PubMed ID: 31200907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Phase I (or phase II) dose-ranging clinical trials: proposal of a two-stage Bayesian design.
    Zohar S; Chevret S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 12635905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.
    Babb J; Rogatko A; Zacks S
    Stat Med; 1998 May; 17(10):1103-20. PubMed ID: 9618772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
    Paoletti X; Kramar A
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adaptive dose finding for phase I clinical trials of drugs used for chemotherapy of cancer.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1805-23. PubMed ID: 12111891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.
    Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 27435150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bridging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials in different ethnic populations.
    Liu S; Pan H; Xia J; Huang Q; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(10):1681-94. PubMed ID: 25626429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A simulation-based comparison of the traditional method, Rolling-6 design and a frequentist version of the continual reassessment method with special attention to trial duration in pediatric Phase I oncology trials.
    Onar-Thomas A; Xiong Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 May; 31(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 20298812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Software to compute and conduct sequential Bayesian phase I or II dose-ranging clinical trials with stopping rules.
    Zohar S; Latouche A; Taconnet M; Chevret S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Oct; 72(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 12941516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials.
    Neuenschwander B; Branson M; Gsponer T
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2420-39. PubMed ID: 18344187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accrual strategies for phase I trials with delayed patient outcome.
    Thall PF; Lee JJ; Tseng CH; Estey EH
    Stat Med; 1999 May; 18(10):1155-69. PubMed ID: 10363337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison between continuous and discrete doses for model based designs in cancer dose finding.
    Diniz MA; Tighiouart M; Rogatko A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210139. PubMed ID: 30625194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An adaptive dose-finding approach for correlated bivariate binary and continuous outcomes in phase I oncology trials.
    Hirakawa A
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(6):516-32. PubMed ID: 22108785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A curve-free method for phase I clinical trials.
    Gasparini M; Eisele J
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):609-15. PubMed ID: 10877324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The superiority of the time-to-event continual reassessment method to the rolling six design in pediatric oncology Phase I trials.
    Zhao L; Lee J; Mody R; Braun TM
    Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 21610004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Bayesian adaptive design for cancer phase I trials using a flexible range of doses.
    Tighiouart M; Cook-Wiens G; Rogatko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):562-574. PubMed ID: 28858566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.
    Wang Y; Ivanova A
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of two phase I trial designs.
    Korn EL; Midthune D; Chen TT; Rubinstein LV; Christian MC; Simon RM
    Stat Med; 1994 Sep; 13(18):1799-806. PubMed ID: 7997713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.
    Oron AP; Hoff PD
    Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 23345304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.