These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10399413)

  • 1. Fluoride release, microbial inhibition and microleakage pattern of two orthodontic band cements.
    Gillgrass TJ; Millett DT; Creanor SL; MacKenzie D; Bagg J; Gilmour WH; Foye RH
    J Dent; 1999 Aug; 27(6):455-61. PubMed ID: 10399413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluoride release from orthodontic band cements-a comparison of two in vitro models.
    Caves GR; Millett DT; Creanor SL; Foye RH; Gilmour WH
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 12615016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of orthodontic band cement at the cement-enamel and cement-band interfaces.
    Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H; Ulker M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 20362915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Growth inhibition of glass ionomer cements on mutans streptococci.
    Loyola-Rodriguez JP; Garcia-Godoy F; Lindquist R
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 7831139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Band cementation materials: solubility and fluoride release.
    Lund RG; da Silva AF; Demarco FF; Del-Pino FA; Piva E; Michelon D
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2008; 6(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 19178098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
    Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antibacterial properties of current orthodontic band cements.
    Vokus RP; Cisneros GJ; Levi M
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 9524972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing.
    Chin MY; Sandham A; Rumachik EN; Ruben JL; Huysmans MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 19815157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluoride release from two types of fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives: Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements-An in vitro study.
    Dziuk Y; Chhatwani S; Möhlhenrich SC; Tulka S; Naumova EA; Danesh G
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247716. PubMed ID: 33635885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluoride release of glass ionomer-based luting cements in vitro.
    Robertello FJ; Coffey JP; Lynde TA; King P
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 10424980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial.
    Gillgrass TJ; Benington PC; Millett DT; Newell J; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11455377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of fluoride-releasing dental materials using a new in vitro method.
    Perez CR; Hirata R; Sérgio PP
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 12859092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of air polishing on the fluoride release of (resin-modified) glass ionomer cements and of a polyacid-modified composite resin.
    Jost-Brinkmann PG
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 15490782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term fluoride release of some orthodontic bonding resins: a laboratory study.
    Trimpeneers LM; Verbeeck RM; Dermaut LR
    Dent Mater; 1998 Mar; 14(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10023204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enamel demineralization inhibition by cements at orthodontic band margins.
    VanMiller EJ; Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 14677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of in vitro enamel demineralization potential of 3 orthodontic cements.
    Foley T; Aggarwal M; Hatibovic-Kofman S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 12045772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evaluation of microleakage and fluoride release of different types of glass ionomer cements.
    Bahsi E; Sagmak S; Dayi B; Cellik O; Akkus Z
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jul; 22(7):961-970. PubMed ID: 31293262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.