133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10401529)
1. Comparative data from young men and women on masseter muscle fibres, function and facial morphology.
Tuxen A; Bakke M; Pinholt EM
Arch Oral Biol; 1999 Jun; 44(6):509-18. PubMed ID: 10401529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationships between craniofacial morphology and masticatory muscle activity during isometric contraction at different interocclusal distances.
Takeuchi-Sato T; Arima T; Mew M; Svensson P
Arch Oral Biol; 2019 Feb; 98():52-60. PubMed ID: 30448395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics.
Hannam AG; Wood WW
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Dec; 80(4):429-45. PubMed ID: 2603948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of human oro-facial and masticatory muscles with respect to fibre types, myosins and capillaries. Morphological, enzyme-histochemical, immuno-histochemical and biochemical investigations.
Stål P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1994; 98():1-55. PubMed ID: 7801228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors.
Bakke M; Tuxen A; Vilmann P; Jensen BR; Vilmann A; Toft M
Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Jun; 100(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 1631486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children.
Charalampidou M; Kjellberg H; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18320415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masticatory biomechanics and masseter fiber-type plasticity.
Ravosa MJ; Ning J; Costley DB; Daniel AN; Stock SR; Stack MS
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2010 Mar; 10(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 20190379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Masseter thickness measured by ultrasonography of 50 young healthy adults in relation to facial morphology].
Zhao JZ; Dai Q; Lai QS
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Feb; 23(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 12905821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variables related to masseter muscle function: a maximum R2 improvement analysis.
Bakke M; Stoltze K; Tuxen A
Scand J Dent Res; 1993 Jun; 101(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 8322010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masseter muscle performance. Significance of structure and metabolism. A morphological and experimental study.
Ström D
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 67():1-94. PubMed ID: 2326743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histochemical characterization of masseter muscle fibres in a biopsy study of normal young women.
Tuxen A; Bakke M; Kenrad B
Arch Oral Biol; 1992 Nov; 37(11):889-93. PubMed ID: 1466637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Facial morphology and the size and activity of the masseter muscle].
Ruf S; Pancherz H; Kirschbaum M
Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1994 Oct; 55(5):219-27. PubMed ID: 7995603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of food consistency on the rabbit masseter muscle fibres.
Langenbach G; van de Pavert S; Savalle W; Korfage H; van Eijden T
Eur J Oral Sci; 2003 Feb; 111(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 12558812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and its relation to facial morphology.
Kiliaridis S; Kälebo P
J Dent Res; 1991 Sep; 70(9):1262-5. PubMed ID: 1918575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of interocclusal distance on bite force and masseter EMG in healthy participants.
Arima T; Takeuchi T; Honda K; Tomonaga A; Tanosoto T; Ohata N; Svensson P
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Dec; 40(12):900-8. PubMed ID: 24033381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fibre type grouping in porcine masseter and soleus muscles assessed by the enclosed fibre type concept. A statistical and computational analysis.
Ström D; Holm S
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 May; 24(5):389-400. PubMed ID: 9183034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Craniofacial morphology and growth in the ferret: effects from alteration of masticatory function.
He T
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2004; (165):1-72. PubMed ID: 15224640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contributions of facial morphology, age, and gender to EMG activity under biting and resting conditions: a canonical correlation analysis.
Fogle LL; Glaros AG
J Dent Res; 1995 Aug; 74(8):1496-500. PubMed ID: 7560405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
Farella M; Bakke M; Michelotti A; Rapuano A; Martina R
Eur J Oral Sci; 2003 Jun; 111(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 12786947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
