These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10402104)

  • 1. The polar average reference effect: a bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording.
    Junghöfer M; Elbert T; Tucker DM; Braun C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Jun; 110(6):1149-55. PubMed ID: 10402104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the Surface Potential Integral of a Dipole in a Volume Conductor Always Zero? A Cloud Over the Average Reference of EEG and ERP.
    Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2017 Mar; 30(2):161-171. PubMed ID: 28194613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method to standardize a reference of scalp EEG recordings to a point at infinity.
    Yao D
    Physiol Meas; 2001 Nov; 22(4):693-711. PubMed ID: 11761077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spherical splines and average referencing in scalp electroencephalography.
    Ferree TC
    Brain Topogr; 2006; 19(1-2):43-52. PubMed ID: 17019635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal reference electrode selection for electric source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Williamson SJ; Gueziec A; Hummel R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Aug; 99(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 8761052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the reference choice on scalp EEG connectivity estimation.
    Chella F; Pizzella V; Zappasodi F; Marzetti L
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036016. PubMed ID: 27138114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Issues and considerations for using the scalp surface Laplacian in EEG/ERP research: A tutorial review.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Sep; 97(3):189-209. PubMed ID: 25920962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping EEG-potentials on the surface of the brain: a strategy for uncovering cortical sources.
    Junghöfer M; Elbert T; Leiderer P; Berg P; Rockstroh B
    Brain Topogr; 1997; 9(3):203-17. PubMed ID: 9104831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EEG assessment of brain activity: spatial aspects, segmentation and imaging.
    Lehmann D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1984 Mar; 1(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 6542911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemifield-dependent N1 and event-related theta/delta oscillations: An unbiased comparison of surface Laplacian and common EEG reference choices.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Sep; 97(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 25562833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electroencephalography in ellipsoidal geometry with fourth-order harmonics.
    Alcocer-Sosa M; Gutierrez D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():4523-4526. PubMed ID: 28269282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating regional brain activity from evoked potential fields on the scalp.
    Srebro R; Oguz RM; Hughlett K; Purdy PD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jun; 40(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 8262532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information-based modeling of event-related brain dynamics.
    Onton J; Makeig S
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 159():99-120. PubMed ID: 17071226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emulation of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) components with the 3-shell head model and the problem of 'ghost potential fields' when using an average reference in brain mapping.
    Desmedt JE; Chalklin V; Tomberg C
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(4):243-58. PubMed ID: 1695136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of spatial selectivity and decrease of mutual information of tri-polar concentric ring electrodes.
    Koka K; Besio WG
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Sep; 165(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 17681379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inadequacy of the average reference for the topographic mapping of focal enhancements of brain potentials.
    Tomberg C; Noël P; Ozaki I; Desmedt JE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(4):259-65. PubMed ID: 1695137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dangerous phase.
    Schiff SJ
    Neuroinformatics; 2005; 3(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 16284414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EEG/EP: new techniques.
    Skrandies W
    Brain Topogr; 1993; 5(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 8357705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.