137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10404143)
1. High-resolution cytometry of FISH dots in interphase cell nuclei.
Kozubek M; Kozubek S; Lukásová E; Marecková A; Bártová E; Skalníková M; Jergová A
Cytometry; 1999 Aug; 36(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 10404143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined confocal and wide-field high-resolution cytometry of fluorescent in situ hybridization-stained cells.
Kozubek M; Kozubek S; Lukásová E; Bártová E; Skalníková M; Matula P; Matula P; Jirsová P; Cafourková A; Koutná I
Cytometry; 2001 Sep; 45(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11598941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FISH and chips: automation of fluorescent dot counting in interphase cell nuclei.
Netten H; Young IT; van Vliet LJ; Tanke HJ; Vroljik H; Sloos WC
Cytometry; 1997 May; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9136750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated microaxial tomography of cell nuclei after specific labelling by fluorescence in situ hybridisation.
Kozubek M; Skalníková M; Matula P; Bártová E; Rauch J; Neuhaus F; Eipel H; Hausmann M
Micron; 2002; 33(7-8):655-65. PubMed ID: 12475562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization with repetitive DNA probes: quantification by digital image analysis.
Celeda D; Aldinger K; Haar FM; Hausmann M; Durm M; Ludwig H; Cremer C
Cytometry; 1994 Sep; 17(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 8001456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals by image cytometry.
Nederlof PM; van der Flier S; Verwoerd NP; Vrolijk J; Raap AK; Tanke HJ
Cytometry; 1992; 13(8):846-52. PubMed ID: 1459002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resolution of mitotic cells using laser scanning cytometry.
Luther E; Kamentsky LA
Cytometry; 1996 Apr; 23(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 8900469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved confocal characterization of targets in nuclei of cytogenetic preparations.
Kahn E; Coullin P; Frouin F; Todd-Pokropek A; Bernheim A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2002 Jun; 24(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12102131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of t(9;22)(q34;q11) in interphase nuclei.
Kajtár B; Méhes G; Lörch T; Deák L; Kneifné M; Alpár D; Pajor L
Cytometry A; 2006 Jun; 69(6):506-14. PubMed ID: 16646048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CCD microscopy and image analysis of cells and chromosomes stained by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Tanke HJ; Florijn RJ; Wiegant J; Raap AK; Vrolijk J
Histochem J; 1995 Jan; 27(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 7713755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metaphase and interphase mapping by FISH: improvement of chromosome banding and signal resolution in interphase nuclei by means of iterative deconvolution.
Monier K; Usson Y; Mongelard F; Szepetowski P; Robert-Nicoud M; Vourc'h C
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1996; 72(2-3):200-4. PubMed ID: 8978776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted analysis of methylation status of individual interphase nuclei in human cultured cells.
de Capoa A; Di Leandro M; Grappelli C; Menendez F; Poggesi I; Giancotti P; Marotta MR; Spanò A; Rocchi M; Archidiacono N; Niveleau A
Cytometry; 1998 Feb; 31(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 9482277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative FISH by image cytometry for the detection of chromosome 1 imbalances in breast cancer: a novel approach analyzing chromosome rearrangements within interphase nuclei.
Truong K; Guilly MN; Gerbault-Seureau M; Malfoy B; Vielh P; Bourgeois CA; Dutrillaux B
Lab Invest; 1998 Dec; 78(12):1607-13. PubMed ID: 9881960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a robust immuno-S-FISH protocol using imaging flow cytometry.
Fuller KA; Bennett S; Hui H; Chakera A; Erber WN
Cytometry A; 2016 Aug; 89(8):720-30. PubMed ID: 27144299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Slide-based laser scanning cytometry.
Kamentsky LA; Burger DE; Gershman RJ; Kamentsky LD; Luther E
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):123-43. PubMed ID: 9022736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enumeration of interphase chromosomes. Comparison of visual in situ hybridization and confocal fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Becker RL; Mikel UV; Oliver WR; Sesterhenn IA
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1996 Oct; 18(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 8908313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of inter- and intra-nuclear variation of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals.
Nederlof PM; van der Flier S; Raap AK; Tanke HJ
Cytometry; 1992; 13(8):831-8. PubMed ID: 1459000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smart 3D-FISH: automation of distance analysis in nuclei of interphase cells by image processing.
Gué M; Messaoudi C; Sun JS; Boudier T
Cytometry A; 2005 Sep; 67(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16082715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) signal analysis using automated generated projection images.
Wang X; Chen X; Li Y; Liu H; Li S; Zhang RR; Zheng B
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2012; 35(5-6):395-405. PubMed ID: 22935778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of cosmids and telomeres in cytogenetic preparations by 3D confocal fluorescence.
Kahn E; Philippe C; Frouin F; Di Paola R; Bernheim A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1998 Dec; 20(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 9870099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
