These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10404671)

  • 1. The effect of using different culling regimens on genetic response with two-trait, two-stage selection in a nucleus broiler stock.
    Mehrabani-Yeganeh H; Gibson JP; Uimari P
    Poult Sci; 1999 Jul; 78(7):931-6. PubMed ID: 10404671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of culling on selection response using phenotypic selection or best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values in small, closed herds of swine.
    Kuhlers DL; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2338-48. PubMed ID: 1506297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using recent versus complete pedigree data in genetic evaluation of a closed nucleus broiler line.
    Mehrabani-Yeganeh H; Gibson JP; Schaeffer LR
    Poult Sci; 1999 Jul; 78(7):937-41. PubMed ID: 10404672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd.
    Belonsky GM; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1124-31. PubMed ID: 3397339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of index selection and best linear unbiased prediction for simulated layer poultry data.
    Jeyaruban MG; Gibson JP; Gowe RS
    Poult Sci; 1995 Oct; 74(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8559719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of selection based on phenotype, selection index and best linear unbiased prediction using data from a closed broiler line.
    Morris AJ; Pollott GE
    Br Poult Sci; 1997 Jul; 38(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 9280349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-selection against a lethal recessive allele in breeding schemes with optimum-contribution selection or truncation selection.
    Hjortø L; Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):75. PubMed ID: 34551728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient selection against categorically scored hip dysplasia in dogs is possible using best linear unbiased prediction and optimum contribution selection: a simulation study.
    Malm S; Sørensen AC; Fikse WF; Strandberg E
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Apr; 130(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 23496016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Animal model and multiple trait BLUP applied in poultry genetic evaluation].
    Pang H; Wu CX; Zhang Y; Gong GF; Bi YH
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 2486251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-stage selection strategies utilizing marker-quantitative trait locus information and individual performance.
    Gomez-Raya L; Klemetsdal G
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):2008-18. PubMed ID: 10461975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of selection methods at the same level of inbreeding.
    Quinton M; Smith C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 1582935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stochastic dynamic simulation modeling including multitrait genetics to estimate genetic, technical, and financial consequences of dairy farm reproduction and selection strategies.
    Kaniyamattam K; Elzo MA; Cole JB; De Vries A
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Oct; 99(10):8187-8202. PubMed ID: 27497901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indirect genetic effects and inbreeding: consequences of BLUP selection for socially affected traits on rate of inbreeding.
    Khaw HL; Ponzoni RW; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):39. PubMed ID: 24961990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.
    Liu H; Henryon M; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 27531662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple-trait breeding values for parental selection in self-pollinating crops.
    Bauer AM; Léon J
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Jan; 116(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 17955207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.