122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10404672)
1. Using recent versus complete pedigree data in genetic evaluation of a closed nucleus broiler line.
Mehrabani-Yeganeh H; Gibson JP; Schaeffer LR
Poult Sci; 1999 Jul; 78(7):937-41. PubMed ID: 10404672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of using different culling regimens on genetic response with two-trait, two-stage selection in a nucleus broiler stock.
Mehrabani-Yeganeh H; Gibson JP; Uimari P
Poult Sci; 1999 Jul; 78(7):931-6. PubMed ID: 10404671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of restricted maximum likelihood and method R for estimating heritability and predicting breeding value under selection.
Cantet RJ; Birchmeier AN; Santos-Cristal MG; de Avila VS
J Anim Sci; 2000 Oct; 78(10):2554-60. PubMed ID: 11048920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The distribution of genetic founder contributions within and among selection and control lines of an experiment with laying hens.
Hagger C; Steiger D
J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Apr; 122 Suppl 1():15-21. PubMed ID: 16130452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between estimation of breeding values and fixed effects using Bayesian and empirical BLUP estimation under selection on parents and missing pedigree information.
Schenkel FS; Schaeffer LR; Boettcher PJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 11929624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of index selection and best linear unbiased prediction for simulated layer poultry data.
Jeyaruban MG; Gibson JP; Gowe RS
Poult Sci; 1995 Oct; 74(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8559719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens.
Chen CY; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Meuwissen TH; Aggrey SE; Wing T; Muir WM
J Anim Sci; 2011 Jan; 89(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20889689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New cycle, same old mistakes? Overlapping vs. discrete generations in long-term recurrent selection.
Labroo MR; Rutkoski JE
BMC Genomics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):736. PubMed ID: 36316650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations.
Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 11929623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indirect genetic effects and inbreeding: consequences of BLUP selection for socially affected traits on rate of inbreeding.
Khaw HL; Ponzoni RW; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):39. PubMed ID: 24961990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci in population with overlapping generations.
Tang GQ; Li XW
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 May; 33(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 16722338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pedigree relationships to control inbreeding in optimum-contribution selection realise more genetic gain than genomic relationships.
Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Su G; Nielsen HM; Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):39. PubMed ID: 31286868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
