These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10405376)

  • 1. Utility of multiple-stool-specimen ova and parasite examinations in a high-prevalence setting.
    Cartwright CP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Aug; 37(8):2408-11. PubMed ID: 10405376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A rational approach to the stool ova and parasite examination.
    Branda JA; Lin TY; Rosenberg ES; Halpern EF; Ferraro MJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Apr; 42(7):972-8. PubMed ID: 16511762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of rejection criteria for stool ovum and parasite examinations.
    Morris AJ; Wilson ML; Reller LB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Dec; 30(12):3213-6. PubMed ID: 1452704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical utility of multiple stool ova and parasite examinations in low-prevalence patient populations.
    Furuno JP; Maguire JH; Green HP; Johnson JA; Heimer R; Johnston SP; Braden CR; Edberg SC; Bell S; Hirshon JM
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Sep; 43(6):795-6. PubMed ID: 16912961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The need for three stool specimens in routine laboratory examinations for intestinal parasites.
    Nazer H; Greer W; Donnelly K; Mohamed AE; Yaish H; Kagalwalla A; Pavillard R
    Br J Clin Pract; 1993; 47(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 8334067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of an enzyme immunoassay does not eliminate the need to analyze multiple stool specimens for sensitive detection of Giardia lamblia.
    Hanson KL; Cartwright CP
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 39(2):474-7. PubMed ID: 11158092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response to the editorial commentary "clinical importance of adequately performed stool ova and parasite examinations".
    Branda JA; Ferraro MJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Sep; 43(6):794-5. PubMed ID: 16912960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variations in helminth faecal egg counts in Kato-Katz thick smears and their implications in assessing infection status with Schistosoma mansoni.
    Berhe N; Medhin G; Erko B; Smith T; Gedamu S; Bereded D; Moore R; Habte E; Redda A; Gebre-Michael T; Gundersen SG
    Acta Trop; 2004; 92(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 15533288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement of routine diagnosis of intestinal parasites with multiple sampling and SAF-fixative in the triple-faeces-test.
    Vandenberg O; Van Laethem Y; Souayah H; Kutane WT; van Gool T; Dediste A
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2006; 69(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 17343076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of pooled formalin-preserved fecal specimens with three individual samples for detection of intestinal parasites.
    Aldeen WE; Shisenant J; Hale D; Matsen J; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jan; 31(1):144-5. PubMed ID: 8417020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonutility of routine testing of stool for ova and parasites in a tertiary care Canadian centre.
    Mosli M; Gregor J; Chande N; Lannigan R
    Can J Microbiol; 2012 May; 58(5):653-9. PubMed ID: 22540249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How many stool examinations are necessary to detect pathogenic intestinal protozoa?
    Hiatt RA; Markell EK; Ng E
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 1995 Jul; 53(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 7625530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra-specimen and day-to-day variations of Fasciola egg counts in human stools.
    el-Morshedy H; Shehab AY; Zaki A; Farag HF
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):619-25. PubMed ID: 15603045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and Analytical Evaluation of a Single-Vial Stool Collection Device with Formalin-Free Fixative for Improved Processing and Comprehensive Detection of Gastrointestinal Parasites.
    Couturier BA; Jensen R; Arias N; Heffron M; Gubler E; Case K; Gowans J; Couturier MR
    J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 53(8):2539-48. PubMed ID: 26019199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parasitic stool testing in newly arrived refugees in Calgary, Alta.
    DeVetten G; Dirksen M; Weaver R; Chowdhury TT; Aucoin MW
    Can Fam Physician; 2017 Dec; 63(12):e518-e525. PubMed ID: 29237648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost containment of formalin-preserved stool specimens for ova and parasites from outpatients.
    Peters CS; Hernandez L; Sheffield N; Chittom-Swiatlo AL; Kocka FE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):1584-5. PubMed ID: 3170715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thick stool smear wet mount examination: a new approach in stool microscopy.
    Parija SC; Bhattacharya S; Padhan P
    Trop Doct; 2003 Jul; 33(3):173. PubMed ID: 12870610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical importance of adequately performed stool ova and parasite examinations.
    Rosenblatt JE
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Apr; 42(7):979-80. PubMed ID: 16511763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absence of significant differences in intestinal parasite prevalence estimates after examination of either one or two stool specimens.
    Gyorkos TW; MacLean JD; Law CG
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Nov; 130(5):976-80. PubMed ID: 2816904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of stool ova and parasite examination in the tropics.
    Suputtamongkol Y; Waywa D; Assanasan S; Rongrungroeng Y; Bailey JW; Beeching NJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Sep; 43(6):793-4. PubMed ID: 16912959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.