These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of surface treatment on orthodontic bonding to amalgam. Skilton JW; Tyas MJ; Woods MG Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16792246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META. Sheela K; Sudeep PT; Hegde V; Francis RF; Bhat KS Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bonding amalgam to a resin-modified glass-ionomer base. Belcher MA; Kunsemiller JA Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):305-8. PubMed ID: 10850252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ; Connolly J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years. Smales RJ; Wetherell JD Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants. de Luca-Fraga LR; Pimenta LA Quintessence Int; 2001 Jun; 32(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 11491626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations. Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recreating Mother Nature with direct resin restorations. Nazarian A Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):82, 84. PubMed ID: 19408587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam. Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro fracture resistance of teeth with dentin-bonded ceramic crowns and core build-ups. Lang M; McHugh S; Burke FJ Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():88A-96A. PubMed ID: 14674507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement. Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bonding of adhesive resin luting agents to metal and amalgam. Osman SA; McCabe JF; Walls AW Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Dec; 16(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 19177728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]