These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10405859)
1. Selecting diagnostic tests for ruling out or ruling in disease: the use of the Kullback-Leibler distance. Lee WC Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 28(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 10405859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ruling out or ruling in disease with the most sensitive or specific diagnostic test: short cut or wrong turn? Boyko EJ Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8028470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement. Michener LA; Walsworth MK; Doukas WC; Murphy KP Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19887215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 2). Clinical application and usefulness of a diagnostic test]. Cifuentes L; Cerda J Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Aug; 27(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 21046715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kullback-Leibler distance as a measure of the information filtered from multivariate data. Tumminello M; Lillo F; Mantegna RN Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 Sep; 76(3 Pt 1):031123. PubMed ID: 17930215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test. Cantor SB; Kattan MW Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 11059479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of discrepancy of color qualia using Kullback-Leibler divergence. Yamada M; Matsumoto M; Arakaki M; Hebishima H; Inage S Biosystems; 2023 Oct; 232():105011. PubMed ID: 37657748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probabilistic analysis of global performances of diagnostic tests: interpreting the Lorenz curve-based summary measures. Lee WC Stat Med; 1999 Feb; 18(4):455-71. PubMed ID: 10070686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. HÃ¥konsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Termination Rules for Variable-Length CD-CAT From the Information Theory Perspective. Guo L; Zheng C Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1122. PubMed ID: 31191385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-sensitivity troponin assays for the early rule-out or diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Westwood M; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Whiting P; Thokala P; Joore M; Armstrong N; Ross J; Severens J; Kleijnen J Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jun; 19(44):1-234. PubMed ID: 26118801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying performance of a diagnostic test as the expected information for discrimination: Relation to the McKeigue P Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1841-1851. PubMed ID: 29978758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MODEL AVERAGING BASED ON KULLBACK-LEIBLER DISTANCE. Zhang X; Zou G; Carroll RJ Stat Sin; 2015; 25():1583-1598. PubMed ID: 27761098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical research on the efficiency of physical examinations used for diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome]. Chen CW; Pan ZE; Zhang C; Liu CL; Chen L Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2016 May; 29(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 27505960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy in cytopathology. Raab SS Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 10(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 8005047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The interpretation of diagnostic test: a primer for physiotherapists. Davidson M Aust J Physiother; 2002; 48(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 12217073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination. Jin H; Lu Y Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 18556633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of information graphs to evaluate and compare diagnostic tests. Benish WA Methods Inf Med; 2002; 41(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 12061117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistics in the pathology laboratory: characteristics of diagnostic tests. Empson MB Pathology; 2001 Feb; 33(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 11280616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]