These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10406106)

  • 21. Attention to perceive, to learn and to respond.
    Hall G; Rodríguez G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):335-345. PubMed ID: 28587504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the logic of testing the independence assumption in the process-dissociation procedure.
    Hirshman E
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):857-9. PubMed ID: 9796221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mental model organization.
    Radvansky GA; Spieler DH; Zacks RT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Jan; 19(1):95-114. PubMed ID: 8423436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model.
    Conway AR; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1994 Dec; 123(4):354-73. PubMed ID: 7996121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An integrated theory of the mind.
    Anderson JR; Bothell D; Byrne MD; Douglass S; Lebiere C; Qin Y
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Oct; 111(4):1036-60. PubMed ID: 15482072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dissociation of the component processes of attention in healthy adults.
    Gunstad J; Cohen RA; Paul RH; Gordon E
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Oct; 21(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 16887323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Perretta JG; Tonev ST
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 10994220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flexible retrieval: When true inferences produce false memories.
    Carpenter AC; Schacter DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):335-349. PubMed ID: 27918169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanisms of moving the mind's eye: planning and execution of spatial shifts of attention.
    Hazlett CJ; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 15200702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retrieval dynamics in self-terminated memory search.
    Hussey EK; Dougherty MR; Harbison JI; Davelaar EJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):394-416. PubMed ID: 23915296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
    Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional limits in memory retrieval-revisited.
    Green C; Johnston JC; Ruthruff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1083-98. PubMed ID: 21517217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):522-544. PubMed ID: 27874321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Foraging in Semantic Fields: How We Search Through Memory.
    Hills TT; Todd PM; Jones MN
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):513-34. PubMed ID: 26097107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Object-based attention and object working memory: overlapping processes revealed by selective interference effects in humans.
    Barnes LL; Nelson JK; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Prog Brain Res; 2001; 134():471-81. PubMed ID: 11702562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of value in the attentional boost effect.
    Swallow KM; Atir S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):523-542. PubMed ID: 29393819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.
    Vergauwe E; Cowan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1001-6. PubMed ID: 25361821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inferior parietal and right frontal contributions to trial-by-trial adaptations of attention to memory.
    Kizilirmak JM; Rösler F; Bien S; Khader PH
    Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 1614():14-27. PubMed ID: 25892601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cognitive trait anxiety, situational stress, and mental effort predict shifting efficiency: Implications for attentional control theory.
    Edwards EJ; Edwards MS; Lyvers M
    Emotion; 2015 Jun; 15(3):350-9. PubMed ID: 25642722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual-spatial working memory, attention, and scene representation: a neuro-cognitive theory.
    Schneider WX
    Psychol Res; 1999; 62(2-3):220-36. PubMed ID: 10472201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.