These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10406350)

  • 21. Conceptual site models as a tool in evaluating ecological health: the case of the Department of Energy's Amchitka Island nuclear test site.
    Burger J; Mayer HJ; Greenberg M; Powers CW; Volz CD; Gochfeld M
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2006 Jul; 69(13):1217-38. PubMed ID: 16754537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of factors affecting stakeholder risk perception of contaminated sediment disposal in Oslo harbor.
    Sparrevik M; Ellen GJ; Duijn M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 20809566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing environmental attitudes and concerns about a contaminated site in a densely populated suburban environment.
    Burger J
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Feb; 101(1-3):147-65. PubMed ID: 15739267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Environmental awareness of the residents of Szczecin].
    Kuczyński D; Kosik-Bogacka D; Kuźna-Grygiel W
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2006; 52(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 17633127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fishing and risk along the Savannah River: possible intervention.
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 1998 Nov; 55(6):405-19. PubMed ID: 9833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of ecological resources at operating facilities at contaminated sites: The Department of Energy's Hanford Site as a case study.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
    Environ Res; 2019 Mar; 170():452-462. PubMed ID: 30640079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of waste-reduction practices and new environmental paradigm of rural and urban Chinese citizens.
    Chung SS; Poon CS
    J Environ Manage; 2001 May; 62(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 11400463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Household location choices: implications for biodiversity conservation.
    Peterson MN; Chen X; Liu J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):912-21. PubMed ID: 18445074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Setting radon-specific release criteria and demonstrating compliance for land affected by NORM.
    García-Talavera M; Martínez M; Matarranz JL; Ramos L
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1567-71. PubMed ID: 18508275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determinants of a quality wild turkey hunting season.
    Wynveen CJ; Cavin DA; Wright BA; Hammitt WE
    Environ Manage; 2005 Jul; 36(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 16132453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stresses and storms: the case of Bangladesh.
    Ahmad N
    INSTRAW News; 1993; (19):23-7, 32-7. PubMed ID: 12157782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. River pollution from non-point sources: a new simplified method of assessment.
    Munafò M; Cecchi G; Baiocco F; Mancini L
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 15990217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Public and occupational risks of the Nevada (USA) Test Site.
    Inhaber H
    Environ Manage; 2001 Oct; 28(4):505-17. PubMed ID: 11494069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions.
    Mayer HJ; Greenberg MR; Burger J; Gochfield M; Powers C; Kosson D; Keren R; Danis C; Vyas V
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):429-46. PubMed ID: 15876215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Role of uncertainties in protecting ecological resources during remediation and restoration.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Bunn A; Looney B; Jeitner C
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2021 Jun; 84(12):485-502. PubMed ID: 33632081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating public preferences for managing Lake Champlain using a choice experiment.
    Smyth RL; Watzin MC; Manning RE
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):615-23. PubMed ID: 18262328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risk perception in context: the Savannah River Site Stakeholder Study.
    Williams BL; Brown S; Greenberg M; Kahn MA
    Risk Anal; 1999 Dec; 19(6):1019-35. PubMed ID: 10765444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationship among pollution concerns, attitudes toward social problems, and environmental perceptions in abandoned sites using Bayesian inferential analysis.
    Kim EJ; Kang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(8):8007-8018. PubMed ID: 30684182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Low-activity radioactive materials management at the U.S. Department of Energy.
    Marcinowski F; Tonkay DW
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 17033462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. User perceptions on coastal resource state and management options in Curaçao.
    Debrot AO; Nagelkerken I
    Rev Biol Trop; 2000 Dec; 48 Suppl 1():95-106. PubMed ID: 15266797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.