These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10406700)

  • 41. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of powers ratio for assessment of atlanto-occipital junction: comparison of plain radiography and computed tomography.
    Li G; Passias P; Kozanek M; Shannon BD; Li G; Villamil F; Bono CM; Harris M; Wood KB
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Apr; 18(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 19165510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. "Artifactual fracture-subluxation" of cervical spine in computed tomography screening sans plain radiographs.
    Dhandapani S; Salunke P; Mukherjee KK
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):e45-8. PubMed ID: 24017957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reliability and necessity of computerized tomography in distal tibial physeal injuries.
    Thawrani D; Kuester V; Gabos PG; Kruse RW; Littleton AG; Rogers KJ; Holmes L; Thacker MM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2011; 31(7):745-50. PubMed ID: 21926871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Prospective comparison of admission computed tomographic scan and plain films of the upper cervical spine in trauma patients with altered mental status.
    Schenarts PJ; Diaz J; Kaiser C; Carrillo Y; Eddy V; Morris JA
    J Trauma; 2001 Oct; 51(4):663-8; discussion 668-9. PubMed ID: 11586156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reliability and agreement between fine-cut CT scans and plain radiography in the evaluation of posterolateral fusions.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17197331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reproducibility of radiographic measurements for subaxial cervical spine trauma.
    Bono CM; Schoenfeld A; Rampersaud R; Levi A; Grauer J; Arnold P; Fehlings M; Dvorak M; Vaccaro AR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21587104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the lower spine after blunt trauma using abdominal computed tomographic scanning supplemented with lateral scanograms.
    Gestring ML; Gracias VH; Feliciano MA; Reilly PM; Shapiro MB; Johnson JW; Klein W; Kauder DR; Schwab CW
    J Trauma; 2002 Jul; 53(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 12131382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Adequacy of plain radiography in the diagnosis of cervical spine injuries.
    Nguyen GK; Clark R
    Emerg Radiol; 2005 Apr; 11(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 15568161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Injuries missed by limited computed tomographic imaging of patients with cervical spine injuries.
    Barrett TW; Mower WR; Zucker MI; Hoffman JR
    Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 16431221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Radiological assessment of paediatric cervical spine injury in blunt trauma: the potential impact of new NICE guidelines on the use of CT.
    Davies J; Cross S; Evanson J
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):844-53. PubMed ID: 27234435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reliability and reproducibility of dens fracture classification with use of plain radiography and reformatted computer-aided tomography.
    Barker L; Anderson J; Chesnut R; Nesbit G; Tjauw T; Hart R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jan; 88(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 16391255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Magnetic resonance imaging is not needed to clear cervical spines in blunt trauma patients with normal computed tomographic results and no motor deficits.
    Schuster R; Waxman K; Sanchez B; Becerra S; Chung R; Conner S; Jones T
    Arch Surg; 2005 Aug; 140(8):762-6. PubMed ID: 16103286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of computed tomography to predict failure of nonoperative treatment of unilateral facet fractures of the cervical spine.
    Spector LR; Kim DH; Affonso J; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2827-35. PubMed ID: 17108837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Are five-view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status.
    Diaz JJ; Gillman C; Morris JA; May AK; Carrillo YM; Guy J
    J Trauma; 2003 Oct; 55(4):658-63; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 14566119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of computed tomography and plain radiography in assessing traumatic spinal deformity.
    Epstein O; Ludwig S; Gelb D; Poelstra K; O'Brien J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 19412022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Utility of helical computed tomography in differentiating unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations.
    Dailey AT; Shaffrey CI; Rampersaud R; Lee J; Brodke DS; Arnold P; Nassr A; Harrop JS; Grauer J; Bono CM; Dvorak M; Vaccaro A
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2009; 32(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 19264048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Computed tomography for cervical spine trauma. The impact of MDCT on fracture detection and dose deposition.
    Chan PN; Antonio GE; Griffith JF; Yu KW; Rainer TH; Ahuja AT
    Emerg Radiol; 2005 Jul; 11(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 16133623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in acute cervical spine fractures.
    Pourtaheri S; Emami A; Sinha K; Faloon M; Hwang K; Shafa E; Holmes L
    Spine J; 2014 Nov; 14(11):2546-53. PubMed ID: 24269913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Imaging of acute injuries of the cervical spine: value of plain radiography, CT, and MR imaging.
    el-Khoury GY; Kathol MH; Daniel WW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7998567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.