BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10407538)

  • 1. Long-term effect of the chincap on hard and soft tissues.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 21(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 10407538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early treatment of Class III incisor relationship using the chincap appliance.
    Allen RA; Connolly IH; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Oct; 15(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 8223971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in postural class III malocclusion treated with a maxillary removable appliance.
    Alhaija ES
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 17315814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term evaluation after chincap treatment.
    Uner O; Yüksel S; Uçüncü N
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 7781722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
    Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of chincap and maxillary protraction appliances in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions.
    Uçüncü N; Uçem TT; Yüksel S
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Feb; 22(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 10721244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class III malocclusion: the post-retention findings following a non-extraction treatment approach.
    Battagel JM; Orton HS
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 15(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 8436196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of the effects of customized facemask therapy or headgear to the lower arch on the developing Class III face.
    Battagel JM; Orton HS
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):467-82. PubMed ID: 8682163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term effects of chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism.
    Sugawara J; Asano T; Endo N; Mitani H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 2378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment response and long-term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan PW; Hagg U; Yiu C; Wei SH
    Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 3(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 9573887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Soft and hard tissue changes after maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage implant in treatment of Class III malocclusion].
    Meng Y; Liu J; Guo X; Deng K; Liu M; Zhou J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 30(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 22768767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anterior open bite treated with a palatal crib and high-pull chin cup therapy. A prospective randomized study.
    Torres F; Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Pedrin F; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 17101701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 8540481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.