These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10407538)

  • 21. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.
    Kinzinger G; Frye L; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Jan; 70(1):63-91. PubMed ID: 19194676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Class III malocclusion: a comparison of extraction and non-extraction techniques.
    Battagel JM; Orton HS
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):212-22. PubMed ID: 1936140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment].
    Mao B; Tian Y; Wang X; Li J; Zhou Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Feb; 56(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 38318905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Profile changes in patients with class III malocclusions after Delaire mask therapy.
    Kiliçoglu H; Kirliç Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 9563362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of chin cup therapy on the mandible: a longitudinal study.
    Wendell PD; Nanda R; Sakamoto T; Nakamura S
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Apr; 87(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 3857003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Soft tissue profile changes following maxillary protraction in Class III subjects.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Kiki A; Oktay H
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 20053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.
    De Clerck H; Cevidanes L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 21055597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of chincap force on the timing and amount of mandibular growth associated with anterior reversed occlusion (Class III malocclusion) during puberty.
    Mitani H; Fukazawa H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Dec; 90(6):454-63. PubMed ID: 3466526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective controlled evaluation of Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with fixed lingual mandibular growth modificator.
    Alali OH
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 23987240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic criteria for pseudo-Class III malocclusion.
    Rabie AB; Gu Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10629513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chin cup effects using two different force magnitudes in the management of Class III malocclusions.
    Abdelnaby YL; Nassar EA
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):957-62. PubMed ID: 20578869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Binda SK; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maertens JK; van 't Hof MA
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 7957655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of a novel magnetic orthopedic appliance (MOA-III) on the dentofacial complex in mild to moderate skeletal class III children.
    Zhao N; Feng J; Hu Z; Chen R; Shen G
    Head Face Med; 2015 Oct; 11():34. PubMed ID: 26468063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Zelderloo A; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):334-341. PubMed ID: 27742730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.