These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10407593)

  • 1. Coalition building and public opinion. New reproductive technologies and Canadian civil society.
    Roberts JH
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 10407593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introduction to "the new reproductive technologies: a technological handmaid's tale.
    Calver A
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 11651220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proceed with care: new reproductive technologies and the need for boundaries.
    Baird P
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Sep; 12(8):491-8. PubMed ID: 8589567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proposed curbs on reproductive technology.
    Kondro W
    Lancet; 1993 Dec; 342(8885):1477-8. PubMed ID: 11643248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controversial "reprotech" royal commission faces growing criticism.
    Gray C
    CMAJ; 1991 Nov; 145(10):1371-2. PubMed ID: 11653961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statutory prohibitions and the regulation of new reproductive technologies under federal law in Canada.
    Healy P
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):905-46. PubMed ID: 11654474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproduction: a process ripe for regulation? A conference of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction.
    Jonsen AR; Macklin R; White GB
    Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8672893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Canada could ban some reproductive technologies.
    Spurgeon D
    BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6922):154-5. PubMed ID: 11644508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ethics of babymaking.
    Sherwin S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 11644700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surrogate motherhood contracts: should the British or Canadian model fill the U.S. legislative vacuum?
    Serratelli A
    George Washington J Int Law Econ; 1993; 26(3):633-74. PubMed ID: 11652952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gene therapy and genetic alteration.
    Hum Gene Ther; 1994 May; 5(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 8054376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New reproductive technologies: the Canadian perspective.
    Baird PA
    Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):156-66. PubMed ID: 8672901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulating assisted reproductive technologies: an ethical framework.
    Steinbock B
    Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 8672902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New reproductive technologies in Canada and the United States: same problems, different discourses.
    Young AH
    Temple Int Comp Law J; 1998; 12(1):43-85. PubMed ID: 11660812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive genetics: Canadian and European perspectives.
    Knoppers BM; Le Bris S
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):189-201. PubMed ID: 11653018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canada calls for moratorium on IVF technologies.
    Kondro W
    Lancet; 1995 Aug; 346(8971):367. PubMed ID: 11653127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far?
    Cannon J; Haas M
    Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human experimentation. United States and Canada decide to slow down human reproduction research.
    Hosp Ethics; 1994; 10(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 10130748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brief of the Law Reform Commission of Canada to the Royal Commission on new reproductive technologies.
    Jones DJ
    Health Law Can; 1992; 13(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 10121310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.