These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10408074)

  • 1. [Efficacy of ultrasound screening in pregnancy].
    Behrens O; Steiner C; Böhmer S; Mühlhaus K
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(5):228-32. PubMed ID: 10408074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound screening for fetal structural anomalies.
    Gomez KJ; Copel JA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 5(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 8490090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound detection of fetal structural abnormalities in Auckland 1988-9.
    Roberts AB; Hampton E; Wilson N
    N Z Med J; 1993 Oct; 106(966):441-3. PubMed ID: 7694211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy.
    Taipale P; Ammälä M; Salonen R; Hiilesmaa V
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 101(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12576250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: 22 years' experience.
    Carrera JM; Torrents M; Mortera C; Cusí V; Muñoz A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 5(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 7788491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal anomalies in a controlled one-stage ultrasound screening trial. A report from the Helsinki Ultrasound Trial.
    Saari-Kemppainen A; Karjalainen O; Ylöstalo P; Heinonen OP
    J Perinat Med; 1994; 22(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 7877064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of the experience of the investigator on the rate of sonographic diagnosis of fetal malformations in Vienna.
    Bernaschek G; Stuempflen I; Deutinger J
    Prenat Diagn; 1996 Sep; 16(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 8905894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Amniotic fluid volume associated with fetal anomalies diagnosed in a reference center in the Brazilian Northeast].
    Noronha Neto C; Souza AS; Moraes Filho OB; Noronha AM
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 31(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 19578670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening for fetal malformations.
    Lancet; 1992 Oct; 340(8826):1006-7. PubMed ID: 1357405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal congenital abnormalities].
    Bakon I; Sikora J; Machalski T; Szkodny E; Kellas S; Jaworska E
    Ginekol Pol; 2001 Dec; 72(12):950-4. PubMed ID: 11883250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Ultrasound detection of congenital anomalies in 76,155 births in the cities of Bogotá and Cali, 2011-2012].
    García MA; Imbachí L; Hurtado PM; Gracia G; Zarante I
    Biomedica; 2014; 34(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 25504125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound on the prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth in southern France.
    Julian-Reynier C; Philip N; Scheiner C; Aurran Y; Chabal F; Maron A; Gombert A; Aymé S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Jun; 48(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 8051530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal structural anomalies diagnosed during the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy using ultrasonography: a retrospective cohort study.
    Dulgheroff FF; Peixoto AB; Petrini CG; Caldas TMRDC; Ramos DR; Magalhães FO; Araujo Júnior E
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2019; 137(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 31939566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for congenital fetal anomalies in low risk pregnancy: the Kenyatta National Hospital experience.
    Onyambu CK; Tharamba NM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):180. PubMed ID: 29792180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence and distribution of congenital abnormalities in Turkey: differences between the prenatal and postnatal periods.
    Oztarhan K; Gedikbasi A; Yildirim D; Arslan O; Adal E; Kavuncuoglu S; Ozbek S; Ceylan Y
    Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2010 Dec; 50(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 20727003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reliability of ultrasound pregnancy screening].
    Müller RJ; Asseryanis E; Wieser F; Schurz B
    Ultraschall Med; 1996 Aug; 17(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 8999514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Routine second trimester ultrasound screening for prenatal detection of fetal malformations in Sassari University Hospital, Italy: 23 years of experience in 42,256 pregnancies.
    Fadda GM; Capobianco G; Balata A; Litta P; Ambrosini G; D'Antona D; Cosmi E; Dessole S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jun; 144(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 19324492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Congenital malformations of urinary tract and gastrointestinal canal. Incidence of diagnosed cases at 2 years of age compared with prenatal registration].
    Joensen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Apr; 158(16):2246-50. PubMed ID: 8650797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing detection rates of birth defects by prenatal ultrasound leading to apparent increasing prevalence. Lessons learned from the population-based registry of birth defects of Barcelona.
    Salvador J; Borrell A; Lladonosa A
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Nov; 25(11):991-6. PubMed ID: 16231328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolution of prenatal screening and diagnosis and its impact on an unselected population over an 18-year period.
    Boyd PA; Rounding C; Chamberlain P; Wellesley D; Kurinczuk JJ
    BJOG; 2012 Aug; 119(9):1131-40. PubMed ID: 22676508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.