These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

794 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10408769)

  • 1. Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions.
    Ashburner J; Friston KJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 1999; 7(4):254-66. PubMed ID: 10408769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of MRI and cannabinoid type 1 receptor PET templates constructed using DARTEL for spatial normalization of rat brains.
    Kronfeld A; Buchholz HG; Maus S; Reuss S; Müller-Forell W; Lutz B; Schreckenberger M; Miederer I
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6875-84. PubMed ID: 26632044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and evaluation of MRI based Bayesian image reconstruction methods for PET.
    Wang CH; Chen JC; Liu RS
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Jun; 28(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 15121207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear regression with spatial constraint to generate parametric images of ligand-receptor dynamic PET studies with a simplified reference tissue model.
    Zhou Y; Endres CJ; Brasić JR; Huang SC; Wong DF
    Neuroimage; 2003 Apr; 18(4):975-89. PubMed ID: 12725772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-dimensional image registration using symmetric priors.
    Ashburner J; Andersson JL; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 1999 Jun; 9(6 Pt 1):619-28. PubMed ID: 10334905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of spatial normalization procedures and their impact on functional maps.
    Crivello F; Schormann T; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Roland PE; Zilles K; Mazoyer BM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 Aug; 16(4):228-50. PubMed ID: 12112765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian fMRI data analysis with sparse spatial basis function priors.
    Flandin G; Penny WD
    Neuroimage; 2007 Feb; 34(3):1108-25. PubMed ID: 17157034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian spatial model for neuroimaging data based on biologically informed basis functions.
    Huertas I; Oldehinkel M; van Oort ESB; Garcia-Solis D; Mir P; Beckmann CF; Marquand AF
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 161():134-148. PubMed ID: 28782681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A nonparametric bayesian approach to detecting spatial activation patterns in fMRI data.
    Kim S; Smyth P; Stern H
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):217-24. PubMed ID: 17354775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian population receptive field modelling.
    Zeidman P; Silson EH; Schwarzkopf DS; Baker CI; Penny W
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):173-187. PubMed ID: 28890416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: applications.
    Friston KJ; Glaser DE; Henson RN; Kiebel S; Phillips C; Ashburner J
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jun; 16(2):484-512. PubMed ID: 12030833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomic validation of spatial normalization methods for PET.
    Sugiura M; Kawashima R; Sadato N; Senda M; Kanno I; Oda K; Sato K; Yonekura Y; Fukuda H
    J Nucl Med; 1999 Feb; 40(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 10025841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical Markov Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian analysis of fMRI data.
    de Pasquale F; Del Gratta C; Romani GL
    Neuroimage; 2008 Aug; 42(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18538586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic delineation of brain regions on MRI and PET images from the pig.
    Villadsen J; Hansen HD; Jørgensen LM; Keller SH; Andersen FL; Petersen IN; Knudsen GM; Svarer C
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Jan; 294():51-58. PubMed ID: 29146191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of octree regional spatial normalization method for regional anatomical matching.
    Kochunov P; Lancaster J; Thompson P; Boyer A; Hardies J; Fox P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2000 Nov; 11(3):193-206. PubMed ID: 11098797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast nonsupervised 3D registration of PET and MR images of the brain.
    Mangin JF; Frouin V; Bloch I; Bendriem B; Lopez-Krahe J
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1994 Sep; 14(5):749-62. PubMed ID: 8063871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial transformation and registration of brain images using elastically deformable models.
    Davatzikos C
    Comput Vis Image Underst; 1997 May; 66(2):207-22. PubMed ID: 11543561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomically informed basis functions in multisubject studies.
    Kiebel S; Friston KJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 11870925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Baillet S; Garnero L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 May; 44(5):374-85. PubMed ID: 9125822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian fMRI time series analysis with spatial priors.
    Penny WD; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):350-62. PubMed ID: 15627578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.