These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis and adverse drug reactions. Mittmann N; Liu BA; Knowles SR; Shear NH CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(7):987-8. PubMed ID: 10207335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The challenge of subgroup analyses--reporting without distorting. Lagakos SW N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1667-9. PubMed ID: 16625007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials. Sim I; Lavori P N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):61; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials. Imperiale TF N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):61; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials. Khan S; Williamson P; Sutton R N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):60-1; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials. Donner A; Klar N Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials. Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients]. Gøtzsche PC Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(42):5601. PubMed ID: 11059294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer. Wheatley K; Gray RG; Ives NJ N Engl J Med; 2003 Oct; 349(15):1476-9; author reply 1476-9. PubMed ID: 14534343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual patient meta-analysis--rewards and challenges. van Walraven C J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 19595573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Neither Holy Grail nor devil's work: a critical appraisal of meta-analysis]. Koschack J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Nov; 134(48):2465-8. PubMed ID: 19924613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis of raw mean differences. Bond CF; Wiitala WL; Richard FD Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 14664679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Randomized trials should be interpreted carefully]. Lindeberg S Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(9):1004-7. PubMed ID: 10741050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials. Abraham NS; Byrne CJ; Young JM; Solomon MJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 19716267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]