These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10409345)

  • 21. Rockefeller head warns of backlash.
    Lehrman S
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6756):831-2. PubMed ID: 10553888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. GM in the media.
    Moses V
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 22430850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changing attitudes to biotechnology in Japan.
    Macer D; Ng MA
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):945-7. PubMed ID: 10973213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Britain's genetically modified crop controversies: the Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission and the negotiation of 'uncertainty'.
    Grove-White R
    Community Genet; 2006; 9(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 16741346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. UK ethicists say GM foods could help poor. Group back the controversial crops as government warily tests public opinion.
    Ashraf H
    Lancet; 2003 Jun; 361(9374):2051. PubMed ID: 12814720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Popular misconceptions: agricultural biotechnology.
    McHughen A; Wager R
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 27(6):724-8. PubMed ID: 20359558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Farmer fined for growing GM seed.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):615. PubMed ID: 11287907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
    Norrie C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
    Lusk JL; Rozan A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Regulation and exploitation of genetically modified crops.
    Kleter GA; van der Krieken WM; Kok EJ; Bosch D; Jordi W; Gilissen LJ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec; 19(12):1105-10. PubMed ID: 11731773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Democratization is more than lower prices.
    Cayford J
    Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):167; author reply 167. PubMed ID: 12855789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct action.
    Cotter-Howells J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Dec; 18(12):1227. PubMed ID: 11101762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bollworms, genes and ecologists.
    Crawley MJ
    Nature; 1999 Aug; 400(6744):501-2. PubMed ID: 10448848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Plant breeding: UK bioscientists push for crop policy.
    Hume D
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7553):423. PubMed ID: 26017435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. GM crops: science, politics and communication.
    Arntzen CJ; Coghlan A; Johnson B; Peacock J; Rodemeyer M
    Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):839-43. PubMed ID: 14526380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genetically modified crops feed ongoing controversy.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 2000 Jan; 283(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 10634325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Keeping watch over genetically modified crops and foods.
    Beringer J
    Lancet; 1999 Feb; 353(9153):605-6. PubMed ID: 10030321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S.
    Gaskell G; Bauer MW; Durant J; Allum NC
    Science; 1999 Jul; 285(5426):384-7. PubMed ID: 10411496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. US academy study finds GM foods are safe...but critics claim the panel was biased.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):693. PubMed ID: 10783856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.