These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10410166)

  • 1. Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search.
    Krupinski E; Roehrig H; Furukawa T
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Jul; 6(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 10410166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search.
    Krupinski EA; Roehrig H
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jan; 7(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 10645452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.
    Samei E; Poolla A; Ulissey MJ; Lewin JM
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 17434067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation.
    Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Engstrom M; Fan J; Nafziger J; Lubin J; Dallas WJ
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Sep; 10(9):1030-5. PubMed ID: 13678092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images.
    Cook LT; Cox GG; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Gaborski RS; Lure FY
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1132-8. PubMed ID: 9682198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the age of liquid crystal displays influence observer performance?
    Krupinski EA; Roehrig H; Fan J
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 17368216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions.
    Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Nafziger J; Lubin J
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 16023384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monochrome versus color softcopy displays for teleradiology: observer performance and visual search efficiency.
    Krupinski EA; Roehrig H; Fan J; Yoneda T
    Telemed J E Health; 2007 Dec; 13(6):675-81. PubMed ID: 18052875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor.
    Krupinski E; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Lubin J
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Feb; 10(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 12583567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in time to interpretation for evaluation of bone radiographs with monitor and film viewing.
    Krupinski EA; Lund PJ
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Mar; 4(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 9084774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms.
    Hemminger BM; Dillon AW; Johnston RE; Muller KE; Deluca MC; Coffey CS; Pisano ED
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2266-72. PubMed ID: 10587207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Baker J; Delong D; Soo MS; Walsh R; Pisano E; Kuzmiak CM; Pavic D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26. PubMed ID: 17070449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images.
    Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Nafziger J; Fan J; Lubin J
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Dec; 17(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 15692869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
    Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How Does the Display Luminance Level Affect Detectability of Breast Microcalcifications and Spiculated Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Images?
    Ferranti C; Primolevo A; Cartia F; Cavatorta C; Ciniselli CM; Lualdi M; Meroni S; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Scaperrotta G
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 28189505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experimental investigation of the effect of light-box luminance on the detection of low contrast objects in mammography.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):153-9. PubMed ID: 8785644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of display quality on radiologists' performance in the detection of lung nodules on radiographs.
    Buls N; Shabana W; Verbeek P; Pevenage P; De Mey J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):738-43. PubMed ID: 17709363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs.
    Usami H; Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Fukushima H; Shimamoto K
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):726-32. PubMed ID: 16284772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic usefulness of chest computed radiography--film versus cathode-ray tube images.
    Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Endo T; Ikeda M
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):25-30. PubMed ID: 7734536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
    Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.