117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10410476)
1. A comparative study of membrane stripping and nonstripping for induction of labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy.
Tannirandorn Y; Jumrustanasan T
J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Mar; 82(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 10410476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of membrane sweeping at term pregnancy on duration of pregnancy and labor induction: a randomized trial.
Kashanian M; Akbarian A; Baradaran H; Samiee MM
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2006; 62(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 16534210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stripping the fetal membranes at term. Is the procedure safe and efficacious?
McColgin SW; Patrissi GA; Morrison JC
J Reprod Med; 1990 Aug; 35(8):811-4. PubMed ID: 2213744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stripping membranes at term: can it safely reduce the incidence of post-term pregnancies?
McColgin SW; Hampton HL; McCaul JF; Howard PR; Andrew ME; Morrison JC
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):678-80. PubMed ID: 2216203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for initiation of labor in nulliparous women.
Harper TC; Coeytaux RR; Chen W; Campbell K; Kaufman JS; Moise KJ; Thorp JM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Aug; 19(8):465-70. PubMed ID: 16966110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Pongsatha S; Tongsong T; Somsak T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jul; 84(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 11759980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labor in women with oligohydramnios.
Venturini P; Contu G; Mazza V; Facchinetti F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Feb; 17(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 16076620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of membrane stripping in prevention of post-term pregnancy: a randomised clinical trial in Ile-lfe, Nigeria.
Dare FO; Oboro VO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May; 22(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 12521500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae.
Sobande AA; Al-Bar HM; Archibong EI
Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When to induce labor for post-term? A study of induction at 41 weeks versus 42 weeks.
Fok WY; Chan LY; Tsui MH; Leung TN; Lau TK; Chung TK
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Apr; 125(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 16139416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores.
Gelisen O; Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Ozdas E; Dilbaz B; Ozdas E; Haberal A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jun; 120(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15925045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol.
Szczesny W; Kjøllesdal M; Karlsson B; Nielsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 16752237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial.
Cheung PC; Yeo EL; Wong KS; Tang LC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1128-33. PubMed ID: 16929421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.
Heimstad R; Skogvoll E; Mattsson LA; Johansen OJ; Eik-Nes SH; Salvesen KA
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):609-17. PubMed ID: 17329511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labor in great grandmultipara with misoprostol.
Zeteroglu S; Sahin HG; Sahin HA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 May; 126(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16129547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
