These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10410476)

  • 41. Prelabor rupture of membranes at term in low-risk women: induce or wait?
    Zamzami TY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Feb; 273(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 16208479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Tan PC; Jacob R; Omar SZ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):569-77. PubMed ID: 16507926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Aerobic microbiological study in term pregnant women with premature rupture of the membranes: a case-control study.
    Kovavisarach E; Sermsak P; Kanjanahareutai S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jan; 84(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11281495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus spontaneous of labor in grand multiparous women.
    Zamzami TY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 273(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 16160873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial.
    Nielsen PE; Howard BC; Hill CC; Larson PL; Holland RH; Smith PN
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jul; 18(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16105793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of vaginal pH on labor induction with vaginal misoprostol.
    Chandra S; Allen V; Lee W; Fanning C; Young D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jun; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 16009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of membrane sweeping on prelabor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hill MJ; McWilliams GD; Garcia-Sur D; Chen B; Munroe M; Hoeldtke NJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 18515514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Safety and efficacy of stripping of membranes at term.
    Gupta R; Vasishta K; Sawhney H; Ray P
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Feb; 60(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 9509948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cervical ripening. A review and recommendations for clinical practice.
    Poma PA
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Aug; 44(8):657-68. PubMed ID: 10483534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
    Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Membrane sweeping to induce labor in low-risk patients at term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Yildirim G; Güngördük K; Karadağ OI; Aslan H; Turhan E; Ceylan Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jul; 23(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 19895357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of acupuncture for initiation of labor: a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial.
    Ajori L; Nazari L; Eliaspour D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 May; 287(5):887-91. PubMed ID: 23238645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Clinical observation of labor of induction with nutritional food].
    Wang Q; Xu Y; Gai M; Yang J; Wu Y
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1995 Feb; 17(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 7781131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Stripping membranes at term. Review of randomized trials].
    Schmitz T; Goffinet F; Pons JC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Dec; 27(8):749-54. PubMed ID: 10021987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acupuncture and/or sweeping of the fetal membranes before induction of labor: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Andersen BB; Knudsen B; Lyndrup J; Fælling AE; Illum D; Johansen M; Borgen A; Jager H; Bjerre C; Secher NJ
    J Perinat Med; 2013 Sep; 41(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 23612695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Membrane stripping to prevent post-term pregnancy in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ugwu EO; Obi SN; Iferikigwe ES; Dim CC; Ezugwu FO
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jan; 289(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 23764933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sweeping of the membranes versus uterine stimulation by oxytocin in nulliparous women. A randomized controlled trial.
    Salamalekis E; Vitoratos N; Kassanos D; Loghis C; Batalias L; Panayotopoulos N; Creatsas G
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 49(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 10828706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Membrane stripping to promote labor.
    King VJ
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Aug; 43(2):119, 123. PubMed ID: 8708617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.