These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Pearle MS; Watamull LM; Mullican MA J Urol; 1999 Jul; 162(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10379731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary? Wong C; Leveillee RJ J Endourol; 2002 Sep; 16(7):477-81. PubMed ID: 12396440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi. Grasso M; Conlin M; Bagley D J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 9679874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: unenhanced computerized axial tomography to detect retained calculi after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy. Nabi G J Urol; 2000 Mar; 163(3):924. PubMed ID: 10688017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Renal staghorn calculosis: our experience with the percutaneous treatment with or without extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Bianchi G; Malossini G; Beltrami P; Mobilio G; Giusti ; Caluccio G Arch Esp Urol; 1998 Apr; 51(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 9622927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy. Shokeir AA; Sheir KZ; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Eassa W; El-Kappany HA J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):706-10. PubMed ID: 16813924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Removal of staghorn calculi from the urinary tract with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourologic treatment methods]. Zogović J; Mladenović Lj Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1996; 124(11-12):323-7. PubMed ID: 9132970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy--its role in the management of renal and upper ureteric stones. Tan EC; Tung KH; Kwok R; Foo KT Singapore Med J; 1989 Feb; 30(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 2595389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on percutaneous stone procedures. Bush WH; Gibbons RP; Lewis GP; Brannen GE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 3487237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Percutaneous ultrasonic nepholithotripsy]. Kawamura J; Higashi Y; Nishimura M; Kihara Y; Tanaka H; Takenawa A; Nonomura M; Hida S; Oishi K; Yoshida O Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Jun; 31(6):921-9. PubMed ID: 4061210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study. Joseph P; Mandal AK; Singh SK; Mandal P; Sankhwar SN; Sharma SK J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1968-71. PubMed ID: 11956419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High burden stones: the role of SWL. Zanetti G; Paparella S; Ferruti M; Gelosa M; Abed D; Rocco F Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2010 Mar; 82(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 20593719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]