124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10411292)
1. Quality of care in rehabilitation medicine.
Eldar R
Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Feb; 11(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 10411292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conference report: an agenda for medical rehabilitation outcomes research.
Fuhrer MJ
J Allied Health; 1995; 24(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 7657588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A conceptual proposal for the study of the quality of rehabilitation care.
Eldar R
Disabil Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 22(4):163-9. PubMed ID: 10798304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A conceptual framework for the study of the quality of rehabilitation.
Müller D
Disabil Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 23(5):209. PubMed ID: 11336379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Employers, insurers collaborate on quality-measurement study.
Burke M
Hospitals; 1991 Jun; 65(11):32-3. PubMed ID: 2032679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of ambulatory care.
Gonnella JS; Louis DZ
J Ambul Care Manage; 1988 Aug; 11(3):68-83. PubMed ID: 10288686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of the 'Patient perspective On Care and Rehabilitation process' instrument (POCR).
Krevers B; Oberg B
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2002 Oct; 14(5):402-11. PubMed ID: 12602576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient evaluation of the care and rehabilitation process in geriatric hospital care.
Krevers B; Närvänen AL; Oberg B
Disabil Rehabil; 2002 Jun; 24(9):482-91. PubMed ID: 12097217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation research in occupational health services: general principles and a systematic review of empirical studies.
Hulshof CT; Verbeek JH; van Dijk FJ; van der Weide WE; Braam IT
Occup Environ Med; 1999 Jun; 56(6):361-77. PubMed ID: 10474531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is quality improvement?
Rohrer JE
J Prim Care Community Health; 2014 Jan; 5(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 24390600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Researchers say systems should use better yardstick to measure performance.
Greene J
Mod Healthc; 1991 Jul; 21(27):14. PubMed ID: 10111440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The feedback research approach to evaluation: a method to increase evaluation utility.
Rog DJ; Bickman L
Eval Program Plann; 1984; 7(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 10268954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Theoretical and conceptual basis of rehabilitation and models of illness.
Clin Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 28(3):210. PubMed ID: 24552855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized data bases: an integrated approach to monitoring quality of patient care.
Sulton LD; Hardisty B; Bisterfeldt J; Harvey RF
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Dec; 68(12):850-3. PubMed ID: 3426384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The system for medical rehabilitation in Croatia.
Jelić M; Sekelj-Kauzlarić K; Vlak T; Bakran Z; Dzidić I; Eldar R
Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Aug; 28(15):943-8. PubMed ID: 16861202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of population-based performance measures.
Ross JS; Siu AL
Health Serv Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1 Pt 1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17355578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing quality of care: new twists from managed care.
Morreim EH
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 10633279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes management and disease staging.
Markson LE; Nash DB; Louis DZ; Gonnella JS
Eval Health Prof; 1991 Jun; 14(2):201-27. PubMed ID: 10111357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes research: myths and realities.
Krumholz HM
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2009 Jan; 2(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20031804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality study uses patients' perceptions.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1989 Aug; 19(33):4. PubMed ID: 10294501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]