These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10412471)

  • 1. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion.
    Segura A; Donly KJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Sep; 20(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 10412471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective Expansion: Balance between Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion.
    Suiter EA; Watson LE; Tantbirojn D; Lou JS; Versluis A
    J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 26912221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shrinkage stress compensation in composite-restored teeth: relaxation or hygroscopic expansion?
    Meriwether LA; Blen BJ; Benson JH; Hatch RH; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Dent Mater; 2013 May; 29(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23537571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
    Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro investigation of the effects of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage.
    Donly KJ; Wild TW; Bowen RL; Jensen ME
    J Dent Res; 1989 Aug; 68(8):1234-7. PubMed ID: 2632610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth.
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Lee MS; Tu LS; DeLong R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 20970176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit.
    Fleming GJ; Khan S; Afzal O; Palin WM; Burke FJ
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16842899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques.
    Campodonico CE; Tantbirojn D; Olin PS; Versluis A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Oct; 142(10):1176-82. PubMed ID: 21965491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment.
    Bicalho AA; de Souza SJ; de Rosatto CM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration.
    Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15134941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials.
    Moorthy A; Hogg CH; Dowling AH; Grufferty BF; Benetti AR; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):500-5. PubMed ID: 22390980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration on cuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material.
    McHugh LEJ; Politi I; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):e329-e335. PubMed ID: 28688735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
    Stritikus J; Owens B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of using silorane-based resin composite for restoring conservative cavities on the changes in cuspal deflection.
    Shabayek NM; Hassan FM; Mobarak EH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):E1-8. PubMed ID: 23088187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of composite insertion technique on cuspal deflection using an in vitro simulation model.
    Jafarpour S; El-Badrawy W; Jazi HS; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 22313278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.