126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10412809)
21. Johns Hopkins research returns to normal.
Greenberg DS
Lancet; 2001 Aug; 358(9279):393. PubMed ID: 11502331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Reviewing research involving children: the practice of British research ethics committees.
Hall D
IRB; 1988; 10(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Research on the profession of nursing. Ethical inquiry.
Gortner SR
Annu Rev Nurs Res; 1985; 3():193-214. PubMed ID: 3893476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Health science research ethics: a critique.
Coburn D
Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10125790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Challenges in human subject protection.
Nightingale SL
Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 10343016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In our best interests: experience and working of an ethics review committee.
Kliegman RM; Mahowald MB; Youngner SJ
J Pediatr; 1986 Feb; 108(2):178-88. PubMed ID: 3944701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Consent for minors to participate in nontherapeutic research.
Furlow TG
Leg Med; 1980; ():261-73. PubMed ID: 7421392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The tyranny of autonomy.
Sondheimer HM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(2):51. PubMed ID: 2045283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Research and experimentation in hospitals.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Oct; 53(19):58, 60, 64 passim. PubMed ID: 468176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. India. New guidelines promise stronger bioethics.
Bagla P
Science; 2000 Nov; 290(5493):919. PubMed ID: 11184730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Lively debate on research ethics in the US: meeting report.
Nicholson RH
Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Nov; No. 143():3-7. PubMed ID: 11657620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comment: research involving children: clarifying roles and authority.
Kenny N; Miller P
J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11056872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethical issues in pediatric research.
Robinson WM
J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 11056871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.
Gutteridge F; Bankowski Z; Curran W; Dunne J
Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(20):1791-800. PubMed ID: 7178924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Pediatric pulmonology].
Bisgaard H; Pedersen SE; Schiøtz PO
Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Nov; 163(46):6391-5. PubMed ID: 11816914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Seven questions about paediatric research.
Chambers TL
J R Soc Med; 2000 Jun; 93(6):320-1. PubMed ID: 10911833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Do we need to accredit clinical research?
Somberg JC
Am J Ther; 2001; 8(4):223-4. PubMed ID: 11441319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical research in clinical emergency settings in Europe.
Lötjönen S
J Med Ethics; 2002 Jun; 28(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 12042405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
Meslin EM
Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Human experimentation: issues before the hospital administrator.
Wielk CA
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1977; 22(3):4-25. PubMed ID: 12085914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
