These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10413691)

  • 1. Effect of software manipulation (Photoshop) of digitised retinal images on the grading of diabetic retinopathy.
    George LD; Lusty J; Owens DR; Ollerton RL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Aug; 83(8):911-3. PubMed ID: 10413691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
    George LD; Halliwell M; Hill R; Aldington SJ; Lusty J; Dunstan F; Owens DR
    Diabet Med; 1998 Mar; 15(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 9545127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can digitised colour 35 mm transparencies be used to diagnose diabetic retinopathy?
    George LD; Leverton C; Young S; Lusty J; Dunstan FD; Owens DR
    Diabet Med; 1997 Nov; 14(11):970-3. PubMed ID: 9400922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing diabetic retinopathy using two-field digital photography and the influence of JPEG-compression.
    Stellingwerf C; Hardus PL; Hooymans JM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 108(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 15573944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of digital image compression on screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Newsom RS; Clover A; Costen MT; Sadler J; Newton J; Luff AJ; Canning CR
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jul; 85(7):799-802. PubMed ID: 11423452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated diabetic retinopathy detection in smartphone-based fundus photography using artificial intelligence.
    Rajalakshmi R; Subashini R; Anjana RM; Mohan V
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Jun; 32(6):1138-1144. PubMed ID: 29520050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Software for reading and grading diabetic retinopathy: Aravind Diabetic Retinopathy Screening 3.0.
    Perumalsamy N; Prasad NM; Sathya S; Ramasamy K
    Diabetes Care; 2007 Sep; 30(9):2302-6. PubMed ID: 17507695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy in digital retinal images: a tool for diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Usher D; Dumskyj M; Himaga M; Williamson TH; Nussey S; Boyce J
    Diabet Med; 2004 Jan; 21(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 14706060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of diabetic retinopathy: a comparison between red-free digital images and colour transparencies.
    von Wendt G; Summanen P; Hallnäs K; Algvere P; Heikkilä K; Seregard S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 243(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 15729542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: ophthalmoscopy or retinal photography as 35 mm colour transparencies?
    Owens DR; Gibbins RL; Lewis PA; Wall S; Allen JC; Morton R
    Diabet Med; 1998 Feb; 15(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 9507921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is digital image compression acceptable within diabetic retinopathy screening?
    Basu A; Kamal AD; Illahi W; Khan M; Stavrou P; Ryder RE
    Diabet Med; 2003 Sep; 20(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 12925059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colour slides or digital photography in diabetes screening--a comparison.
    Henricsson M; Karlsson C; Ekholm L; Kaikkonen P; Sellman A; Steffert E; Tyrberg M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2000 Apr; 78(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 10794249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography.
    Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T
    Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?
    Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW
    Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid grading of fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy using crowdsourcing.
    Brady CJ; Villanti AC; Pearson JL; Kirchner TR; Gupta OP; Shah CP
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Oct; 16(10):e233. PubMed ID: 25356929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of automated disease detection in diabetic retinopathy screening using two-field photography.
    Goatman K; Charnley A; Webster L; Nussey S
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e27524. PubMed ID: 22174741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
    Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated Retinal Imaging System (ARIS) compared with ETDRS protocol color stereoscopic retinal photography to assess level of diabetic retinopathy.
    Maker MP; Noble J; Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Murtha TJ; Sun JK; Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jun; 14(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 22385213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Krupinski EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.