150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10414128)
1. Holy Grail, sliding scale, and refusal as symptom: competency determinations for medical and psychiatric patients.
Farr M
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1999; 62(2):2-9. PubMed ID: 10414128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward a pure best interests model of proxy decision making for incompetent psychiatric patients.
McCubbin M; Weisstub DN
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 9526712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The issue of informed consent and the use of neuroleptic medications.
Turnquist AC
Int J Nurs Stud; 1983; 20(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 6140242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The presumption for treatment: has it been justified?
Rhoden NK
Law Med Health Care; 1985 Apr; 13(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 11643872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient consent in psychotropic drug treatment.
Garrison A
Princet J Bioeth; 1999; 2(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 11658141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The substituted judgment approach: its difficulties and paradoxes in mental health settings.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Law Med Health Care; 1985 Apr; 13(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 11643871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaches (and possible contraindications) to enhancing patients' autonomy.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 7841467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospitalized psychiatric patients' resistance to routine medical care.
Eilers R
Adm Policy Ment Health; 1994 May; 21(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 11660614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The US Supreme Court looks at voluntariness and consent.
Miller RD
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 7995684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Autonomy, self determination, the right of involuntarily committed persons to refuse treatment, and the use of substituted judgment in medication decisions involving incompetent persons.
Hermann DH
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1990; 13(4):361-85. PubMed ID: 2286496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract.
Dresser RS
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On being 'too crazy' to sign into a mental hospital: the issue of consent to psychiatric hospitalization.
Hoge SK
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):431-50. PubMed ID: 7841515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autonomy and the psychiatric patient.
Matthews E
J Appl Philos; 2000; 17(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 11758594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Method for assessment of competency to consent in the mentally ill. Rationale, development, and comparison with the medically ill.
Kitamura F; Tomoda A; Tsukada K; Tanaka M; Kawakami I; Mishima S; Kitamura T
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(3):223-44. PubMed ID: 9717087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ulysses contracts.
Lavin M
J Appl Philos; 1986 Mar; 3(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 11658829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consent and the mentally disordered detained patient.
Dimond B
Br J Nurs; 2003 Dec 11-2004 Jan 7; 12(22):1331-4. PubMed ID: 14688654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On the right of "nondangerous" incompetent patients to leave psychiatric units against medical advice.
DeGrazia D
Contemp Philos; 1992 Sep; 14(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11660299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to refuse treatment in Quebec.
Morrison D
Health Law Can; 1985; 5():65-8. PubMed ID: 11660312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Restrict the Recruitment of Involuntarily Committed Patients for Psychiatric Research.
Elliott C; Lamkin M
JAMA Psychiatry; 2016 Apr; 73(4):317-8. PubMed ID: 26864804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Procedural paternalism in competency determination.
McCrary SV; Walman AT
Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(1-2):108-13. PubMed ID: 2374442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
