230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10414501)
21. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears. A study with cytohistologic correlation.
Burja IT; Thompson SK; Sawyer WL; Shurbaji MS
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 10349361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of time interval between referral and colposcopy on detection of human papillomavirus DNA and on outcome of biopsy.
Berkova Z; Kaufmann RH; Unger ER; Reeves WC; Adam E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 188(4):932-7. PubMed ID: 12712088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. HPV genotyping for triage of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study.
Nakamura Y; Matsumoto K; Satoh T; Nishide K; Nozue A; Shimabukuro K; Endo S; Nagai K; Oki A; Ochi H; Morishita Y; Noguchi M; Yoshikawa H
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Oct; 20(5):974-81. PubMed ID: 25652908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness of liquid-based cytology and papanicolaou tests in a low risk population.
Lerma E; Quintana MJ; Quilez M; Esteva E; Carreras A; Bonfill X; Prat J; Calaf J
Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 17536542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis.
Lee KR; Manna EA; St John T
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Oct; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 8575278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology.
Schnatz PF; Guile M; O'Sullivan DM; Sorosky JI
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):701-8. PubMed ID: 16507944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): clinical considerations and cytohistologic correlation.
Nasuti JF; Fleisher SR; Gupta PK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Mar; 26(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 11892026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The degree of agreement between HPV testing, pap smear and colposcopy in cervical dysplasia diagnosis.
Melinte-Popescu A; Costăchescu G
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2012; 116(2):536-9. PubMed ID: 23077949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Factors associated with abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women].
Fan L; Zou LY; Wu YM; Zhang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 45(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 20420780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
Cheng RF; Hernandez E; Anderson LL; Heller PB; Shank R
J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. "ASCUS, rule out HSIL": cytologic features, histologic correlates, and human papillomavirus detection.
Sherman ME; Tabbara SO; Scott DR; Kurman RJ; Glass AG; Manos MM; Burk RD; Rush BB; Schiffman M
Mod Pathol; 1999 Apr; 12(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 10229496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Review of the Bethesda System atlas does not improve reproducibility or accuracy in the classification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance smears.
Smith AE; Sherman ME; Scott DR; Tabbara SO; Dworkin L; Olson J; Thompson J; Faser C; Snell J; Schiffman M
Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10966559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).
Koss LG; Sherman ME; Cohen MB; Anes AR; Darragh TM; Lemos LB; McClellan BJ; Rosenthal DL; Keyhani-Rofagha S; Schreiber K; Valente PT
Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct; 28(10):1196-203. PubMed ID: 9343327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Punch biopsy guided by both colposcopy and HR-HPV status is more efficient for identification of immediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse among HPV-infected women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Ding Z; Li Y; Chen A; Song M; Zhang Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():32-36. PubMed ID: 27816739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation and management of the AGUS Papanicolaou smear.
Kaferle JE; Malouin JM
Am Fam Physician; 2001 Jun; 63(11):2239-44. PubMed ID: 11417776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cytologic and histologic correlation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
Ha SY; Cho HI; Oh YH; Lee JM; Suh KS
J Korean Med Sci; 2001 Apr; 16(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 11306750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: the experience at long island jewish medical center.
Medalie NS; Wasserman P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Jul; 2(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 25950094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: clinically significant lesions and means of patient follow-up.
Soofer SB; Sidawy MK
Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 10966560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Changing spectrum of squamous cell abnormalities observed on papanicolaou smears in Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Kuwait, over a 13-year period.
Kapila K; George SS; Al-Shaheen A; Al-Ottibi MS; Pathan SK; Sheikh ZA; Haji BE; Mallik MK; Das DK; Francis IM
Med Princ Pract; 2006; 15(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 16763390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
