These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10417463)
1. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs. the laryngeal mask airway: a randomised cross-over study of oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic view in paralysed patients. Brimacombe J; Keller C Anaesthesia; 1999 Jul; 54(7):683-5. PubMed ID: 10417463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway as an alternative to the laryngeal mask airway with positive-pressure ventilation. van Vlymen JM; Fu W; White PF; Klein KW; Griffin JD Anesthesiology; 1999 May; 90(5):1306-10. PubMed ID: 10319778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fibreoptic intubation using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and Aintree intubation catheter. Hawkins M; O'Sullivan E; Charters P Anaesthesia; 1998 Sep; 53(9):891-4. PubMed ID: 9849284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cuffed oropharyngeal airway as a suitable alternative to the laryngeal mask airway for minor outpatient surgery. Yavaşcaoğlu B; Acar HV; Kahveci SF; Kaya FN; Ozcan B Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 12071241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway as an aid to fibreoptic intubation. Pigott DW; Kay NH; Greenberg RS Anaesthesia; 1998 May; 53(5):480-3. PubMed ID: 9659022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the laryngeal mask airway. Keller C; Pühringer F; Brimacombe JR Br J Anaesth; 1998 Aug; 81(2):186-7. PubMed ID: 9813520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway. Keller C; Brimacombe J Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients. Tiefenthaler W; Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Fricke E; Keller C; Kaufmann M Anaesthesia; 2013 Jun; 68(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 23550791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients. Shariffuddin II; Wang CY Anaesthesia; 2008 Jan; 63(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 18086075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The intubating laryngeal mask airway: effect of handle elevation on efficacy of seal, fibreoptic position, blind intubation and airway protection. Keller C; Brimacombe JR; Rädler C; Pühringer F; Brimacombe NS Anaesth Intensive Care; 2000 Aug; 28(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 10969369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio during face mask, laryngeal mask, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway spontaneous ventilation. Casati A; Fanelli G; Torri G J Clin Anesth; 1998 Dec; 10(8):652-5. PubMed ID: 9873966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Brimacombe J; von Goedecke A; Keller C; Brimacombe L; Brimacombe M Anesth Analg; 2004 Nov; 99(5):1560-1563. PubMed ID: 15502065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fibreoptic views through the laryngeal mask and the intubating laryngeal mask. McNeillis NJ; Timberlake C; Avidan MS; Sarang K; Choyce A; Radcliffe JJ Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2001 Jul; 18(7):471-5. PubMed ID: 11437876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laryngeal mask airway size selection in males and females: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, pharyngeal mucosal pressures and anatomical position. Brimacombe J; Keller C Br J Anaesth; 1999 May; 82(5):703-7. PubMed ID: 10536546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimum alveolar sevoflurane concentrations required for insertion of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway: a comparative study. Tanaka M; Watanabe S; Nishikawa T Anaesthesia; 1999 Dec; 54(12):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10594412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The glottic aperture seal airway: a new ventilatory device. Benumof JL Anesthesiology; 1998 May; 88(5):1219-26. PubMed ID: 9605681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Higher airway seal does not imply adequate positioning of laryngeal mask airways in paediatric patients. Inagawa G; Okuda K; Miwa T; Hiroki K Paediatr Anaesth; 2002 May; 12(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 11982839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of performance and efficacy of air-Q intubating laryngeal airway and flexible laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed infants and children. Darlong V; Biyani G; Pandey R; Baidya DK; Punj Ca Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1066-71. PubMed ID: 24961960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway. Hanning SJ; McCulloch TJ; Orr B; Anderson SP Anaesth Intensive Care; 2006 Apr; 34(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 16617647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]