These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10417931)

  • 1. Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules.
    Perry S; Raby N; Grant PT
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Jul; 16(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 10417931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France: a study in the surgical emergency department of a teaching hospital.
    Auleley GR; Kerboull L; Durieux P; Cosquer M; Courpied JP; Ravaud P
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Jul; 32(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 9656943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective comparison of the Low Risk Ankle Rules and the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a pediatric population.
    Ellenbogen AL; Rice AL; Vyas P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1262-1265. PubMed ID: 28363615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and current local guidelines for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
    Keogh SP; Shafi A; Wijetunge DB
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):341-3. PubMed ID: 9803109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiography in acute ankle injuries: the Ottawa Ankle Rules versus local diagnostic decision rules.
    Pijnenburg AC; Glas AS; De Roos MA; Bogaard K; Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Butzelaar RM; Keeman JN
    Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Jun; 39(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 12023701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.
    Libetta C; Burke D; Brennan P; Yassa J
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 16(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 10505914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurse practitioners.
    Mann CJ; Grant I; Guly H; Hughes P
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1998 Sep; 15(5):315-6. PubMed ID: 9785158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.
    Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL
    Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.
    Papacostas E; Malliaropoulos N; Papadopoulos A; Liouliakis C
    Br J Sports Med; 2001 Dec; 35(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 11726486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.
    Gravel J; Hedrei P; Grimard G; Gouin S
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 54(4):534-540.e1. PubMed ID: 19647341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.
    Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT
    Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.
    Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD
    BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: a survey of physicians' practice patterns.
    Dowling SK; Wishart I
    CJEM; 2011 Sep; 13(5):333-8; E44-6. PubMed ID: 21955415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
    Anis AH; Stiell IG; Stewart DG; Laupacis A
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Oct; 26(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 7574122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging.
    Ashurst JV; Nappe T; Digiambattista S; Kambhampati A; Alam S; Ortiz M; Delpais P; Porter BG; Kurt A; Kane BG; Greenberg MR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Dec; 114(12):890-7. PubMed ID: 25429079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of the Ottawa rules.
    Lucchesi GM; Jackson RE; Peacock WF; Cerasani C; Swor RA
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7793707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
    Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
    CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative analysis of ENP's and SHO's in the application of the Ottawa ankle rules.
    Hopkins M
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2010 Oct; 18(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 20869659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital.
    McBride KL
    Can Fam Physician; 1997 Mar; 43():459-65. PubMed ID: 9116517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.
    Clark KD; Tanner S
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2003 Apr; 19(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12698029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.