229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10418768)
1. Sexual coercion history, calloused sexual beliefs and judgments of sexual coercion in a date rape analogue.
Bernat JA; Wilson AE; Calhoun KS
Violence Vict; 1999; 14(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 10418768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manipulation and force as sexual coercion tactics: conceptual and empirical differences.
Lyndon AE; White JW; Kadlec KM
Aggress Behav; 2007; 33(4):291-303. PubMed ID: 17593561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual coercion experience and sexually coercive behavior: a population study of Swedish and Norwegian male youth.
Seto MC; Kjellgren C; Priebe G; Mossige S; Svedin CG; Långström N
Child Maltreat; 2010 Aug; 15(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 20460305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coercive sexual strategies.
Tyler KA; Hoyt DR; Whitbeck LB
Violence Vict; 1998; 13(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 9650245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "You owe me": effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape.
Basow SA; Minieri A
J Interpers Violence; 2011 Feb; 26(3):479-97. PubMed ID: 20442451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of alcohol on the responses of sexually coercive and noncoercive men to an experimental rape analogue.
Marx BP; Gross AM; Adams HE
Sex Abuse; 1999 Apr; 11(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 10335565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of rape-supportive attitudes and beliefs in college men: development, reliability, and validity of the rape attitudes and beliefs scale.
Burgess GH
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Aug; 22(8):973-93. PubMed ID: 17709805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual material perception in sexually coercive men: disattending deficit and its covariates.
Yoon J; Knight RA
Sex Abuse; 2011 Jun; 23(2):275-91. PubMed ID: 21421803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Date-rape-supporting and victim-blaming attitudes among high school students in a multiethnic society: Israel.
Geiger B; Fischer M; Eshet Y
J Interpers Violence; 2004 Apr; 19(4):406-26. PubMed ID: 15038882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Male and female sexual victimization in dating relationships: gender differences in coercion techniques and outcomes.
Waldner-Haugrud LK; Magruder B
Violence Vict; 1995; 10(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 8777187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationships among perceived peer acceptance of sexual aggression, punishment certainty, and sexually aggressive behavior.
Strang E; Peterson ZD
J Interpers Violence; 2013 Dec; 28(18):3369-85. PubMed ID: 24014542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. College women's experiences of sexual coercion: a review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables.
Adams-Curtis LE; Forbes GB
Trauma Violence Abuse; 2004 Apr; 5(2):91-122. PubMed ID: 15070552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noncoercive sexual contact with similarly aged individuals: what is the impact?
Friedrich WN; Whiteside SP; Talley NJ
J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1075-84. PubMed ID: 15296618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sexual coercion in intimate relationships: a comparative analysis of the effects of women's infidelity and men's dominance and control.
Goetz AT; Shackelford TK
Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Apr; 38(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 18415011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion among Polish college students.
Doroszewicz K; Forbes GB
J Interpers Violence; 2008 Jan; 23(1):58-73. PubMed ID: 18087032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heterosexual experiences of secondary school pupils in Ireland: sexual coercion in context.
Hyde A; Drennan J; Howlett E; Brady D
Cult Health Sex; 2008 Jun; 10(5):479-93. PubMed ID: 18568871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use and acceptance of sexually aggressive tactics in college men.
Warkentin JB; Gidycz CA
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Jul; 22(7):829-50. PubMed ID: 17575065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual coercion in men and women: similar behaviors, different predictors.
Schatzel-Murphy EA; Harris DA; Knight RA; Milburn MA
Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Dec; 38(6):974-86. PubMed ID: 19330440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating a prevention program for teenagers on sexual coercion: a differential effectiveness approach.
Pacifici C; Stoolmiller M; Nelson C
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2001 Jun; 69(3):552-9. PubMed ID: 11495184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Explicating the role of sexual coercion and vulnerability alcohol expectancies in rape attributions.
Starfelt LC; Young RM; White KM; Palk GR
J Interpers Violence; 2015 Jul; 30(11):1965-81. PubMed ID: 25228594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
