These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 104191)

  • 1. The annual Pap test: a dubious policy success.
    Foltz AM; Kelsey JL
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1978; 56(4):426-62. PubMed ID: 104191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Cooper CP; Saraiya M; McLean TA; Hannan J; Liesmann JM; Rose SW; Lawson HW
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):670-8. PubMed ID: 16232098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ambulatory care visits for Pap tests, abnormal Pap test results, and cervical cancer procedures in the United States.
    Saraiya M; McCaig LF; Ekwueme DU
    Am J Manag Care; 2010 Jun; 16(6):e137-44. PubMed ID: 20536271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and cost implications of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: the impact of test sensitivity.
    Hutchinson ML; Berger BM; Farber FL
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):766-80. PubMed ID: 11067374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
    Reust CE
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical cancer screening. Past success and future challenge.
    Dewar MA; Hall K; Perchalski J
    Prim Care; 1992 Sep; 19(3):589-606. PubMed ID: 1410065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of nursing interventions to increase pap smear test screening.
    Guvenc G; Akyuz A; Yenen MC
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Apr; 36(2):146-57. PubMed ID: 23335354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Increase of in-situ cervix uteri carcinoma in women under 35; data analysis from family practice 1974-1986].
    Boon ME; Rietveld WJ; de Graaff Guilloud JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1988 Jul; 132(27):1240-3. PubMed ID: 2840584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cost effectiveness of cervical cancer screening strategies in Tunisia].
    Hsaïri M; Fakhfakh R; Ghyoula M; Ben Abdallah M; Achour N
    Tunis Med; 2000 Oct; 78(10):557-61. PubMed ID: 11190738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis for Pap smear screening and human papillomavirus DNA testing and vaccination.
    Chen MK; Hung HF; Duffy S; Yen AM; Chen HH
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 21679279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. De novo establishment and cost-effectiveness of Papanicolaou cytology screening services in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
    Suba EJ; Nguyen CH; Nguyen BD; Raab SS;
    Cancer; 2001 Mar; 91(5):928-39. PubMed ID: 11251944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France].
    Bergeron C; Breugelmans JG; Bouée S; Lorans C; Bénard S; Rémy V
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1036-42. PubMed ID: 17070085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The comparative and cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening algorithms in El Salvador.
    Campos NG; Maza M; Alfaro K; Gage JC; Castle PE; Felix JC; Cremer ML; Kim JJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Aug; 137(4):893-902. PubMed ID: 25639903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whatever happened to the annual pap smear?
    Vigliani MB
    R I Med J (2013); 2013 Jan; 96(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 23638458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Papanicolaou smear screening of women with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional survey in Taiwan.
    Lin LP; Lin JD; Sung CL; Liu TW; Liu YL; Chen LM; Chu CM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 19897337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
    Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospects for newer technologies in cervical cancer screening programmes.
    Hailey DM; Lea R
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1995 Sep; 15(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 8528539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.