236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10419738)
1. Modified radical hysterectomy for early Ib cervical cancer.
Yang YC; Chang CL
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Aug; 74(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 10419738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival for stage IB cervical cancer with positive lymph node involvement: a comparison of completed vs. abandoned radical hysterectomy.
Richard SD; Krivak TC; Castleberry A; Beriwal S; Kelley JL; Edwards RP; Sukumvanich P
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18234297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study.
Landoni F; Maneo A; Cormio G; Perego P; Milani R; Caruso O; Mangioni C
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jan; 80(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 11136561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].
Wu K; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Li H; Bai P; Li XG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 28(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 16875638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years.
Covens A; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; DePetrillo AD; Lickrish G; Colgan T; Chapman W; Shaw P
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11330939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications of radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: clinical analysis of 270 cases.
Ayhan A; Tuncer ZS; Yarali H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Oct; 17(5):492-4. PubMed ID: 1936296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic difference of surgical treatment of exophytic versus barrel-shaped bulky cervical cancer.
Trimbos JB; Lambeek AF; Peters AA; Wolterbeek R; Gaarenstroom KN; Fleuren GJ; Kenter GG
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 15385113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case-control study.
Beiner ME; Hauspy J; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; Nofech-Mozes S; Ismiil N; Rasty G; Khalifa MA; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Aug; 110(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 18539313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results.
Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Gutowski M; Mourregot A; Fabbro M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Gourgou S; Kerr C; Rouanet P
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19555996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long term complications after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Manchana T; Sirisabya N; Lertkhachonsuk R; Worasethsin P; Khemapech N; Sittisomwong T; Vasuratna A; Termrungruanglert W; Tresukosol D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Apr; 92(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 19374292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of Ib-IIb adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in patients who have had radical hysterectomy.
Irie T; Kigawa J; Minagawa Y; Itamochi H; Sato S; Akeshima R; Terakawa N
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Aug; 26(5):464-7. PubMed ID: 11016467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radical hysterectomy: influence of recent conization on morbidity and complications.
Webb MJ; Symmonds RE
Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Mar; 53(3):290-2. PubMed ID: 424099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary surgery for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer, including short-term and long-term morbidity and treatment in pregnancy.
Magrina JF
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1996; (21):53-9. PubMed ID: 9023829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of aborted radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Leath CA; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Kirby TO; Bhoola SM; Barnes MN; Kilgore LC; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):204-7. PubMed ID: 15385133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic conization of the uterine cervix and its effect on survival of patients after Wertheim-Meigs hysterectomy].
Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(4):3-6. PubMed ID: 14577359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Wertheim-operation: 5-year survival of 501 consecutive patients with cervical cancer].
Papp Z; CsapĆ³ Z; Mayer A; Hupuczi P
Orv Hetil; 2006 Mar; 147(12):537-45. PubMed ID: 16696377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]