182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10420229)
21. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biliary brush cytology in the assessment of biliary strictures at a tertiary center in Iran.
Mohammad Alizadeh AH; Mousavi M; Salehi B; Molaei M; Khodadoostan M; Afzali ES; Dadvar Z; Mirsattari D; Aghdaei HA; Lahmi F; Zali MR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2793-6. PubMed ID: 22320994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma: a study in 65 patients with bile duct strictures.
Rabinovitz M; Zajko AB; Hassanein T; Shetty B; Bron KM; Schade RR; Gavaler JS; Block G; Van Thiel DH; Dekker A
Hepatology; 1990 Oct; 12(4 Pt 1):747-52. PubMed ID: 2210678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endoscopic transpapillary biopsy for diagnosis of patients with pancreaticobiliary ductal strictures.
Kubota Y; Takaoka M; Tani K; Ogura M; Kin H; Fujimura K; Mizuno T; Inoue K
Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Oct; 88(10):1700-4. PubMed ID: 8213710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors Impacting the Performance Characteristics of Bile Duct Brushings: A Clinico-Cytopathologic Analysis of 253 Patients.
Hacihasanoglu E; Memis B; Pehlivanoglu B; Avadhani V; Freedman AA; Goodman MM; Adsay NV; Reid MD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Jul; 142(7):863-870. PubMed ID: 29582676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of novel slim biopsy forceps for diagnosis of biliary strictures: Single-institutional study of consecutive 360 cases (with video).
Yamamoto K; Tsuchiya T; Itoi T; Tsuji S; Tanaka R; Tonozuka R; Honjo M; Mukai S; Kamada K; Fujita M; Asai Y; Matsunami Y; Nagakawa Y; Yamaguchi H; Sofuni A
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Sep; 23(35):6429-6436. PubMed ID: 29085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Single-operator cholangioscopy and targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures: a systematic review.
Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Lourdusamy V; Njei B; Varadarajulu S; Hawes RH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):608-14.e2. PubMed ID: 26071061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of IMP3, S100P, and pVHL immunopanel to aid in the interpretation of bile duct biopsies with atypical histology or suspicious for malignancy.
Schmidt MT; Himmelfarb EA; Shafi H; Lin F; Xu H; Wang HL
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2012 Oct; 20(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 22495381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic utility of peroral cholangioscopy for various bile-duct lesions.
Fukuda Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Sakai Y; Tsuchiya S; Saisyo H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Sep; 62(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 16111955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals.
Logrono R; Kurtycz DF; Molina CP; Trivedi VA; Wong JY; Block KP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Mar; 124(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 10705391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bile duct involvement by hepatocellular carcinoma: A rare occurrence and poor prognostic indicator in bile duct brushing samples.
Bhattarai S; Graham RP; Sigel CS; Shi J; Gonzalez RS; Xue Y; Krasinskas AM; HooKim K; Adsay V; Reid MD
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 127(11):691-699. PubMed ID: 31518056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Significance of KRAS mutation testing in biliary brushing cytology specimens: A 10-year retrospective review.
Sun T; Zuo T; Hui P; Cai G
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Jul; 130(7):558-565. PubMed ID: 35417072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adult bile duct strictures: role of MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in characterization.
Katabathina VS; Dasyam AK; Dasyam N; Hosseinzadeh K
Radiographics; 2014; 34(3):565-86. PubMed ID: 24819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing.
Krishnamurthy S; Katz RL; Shumate A; Strohlein K; Khanna A; Tucker SL; Raijman I; Lahoti S
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 93(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 11391612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
Kurzawinski TR; Deery A; Dooley JS; Dick R; Hobbs KE; Davidson BR
Hepatology; 1993 Dec; 18(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8244264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic pitfalls and the value of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct to cytologic evaluation of bile duct brushings in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Feb; 51(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 36181472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intraductal aspiration: a promising new tissue-sampling technique for the diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures.
Curcio G; Traina M; Mocciaro F; Liotta R; Gentile R; Tarantino I; Barresi L; Granata A; Tuzzolino F; Gridelli B
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):798-804. PubMed ID: 22301344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
