These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10420249)

  • 1. A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sandblasting or acid etching prior to bracket bonding.
    Sargison AE; McCabe JF; Millett DT
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 10420249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An ex vivo investigation to compare orthodontic bonding using a 4-META-based adhesive or a composite adhesive to acid-etched and sandblasted enamel.
    Clark SA; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
    J Orthod; 2003 Mar; 30(1):51-8; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 12644608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface and interfacial analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched enamel for bonding orthodontic adhesives.
    Patcas R; Zinelis S; Eliades G; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S64-75. PubMed ID: 25836346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface.
    Suma S; Anita G; Chandra Shekar BR; Kallury A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22945715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
    Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of surface preparation on shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Elnafar AA; Alam MK; Hasan R
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 25143559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets.
    Canay S; Kocadereli I; Ak"ca E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 10629515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of lingual enamel sandblasting with aluminum oxide of different particle sizes in combination with phosphoric acid etching on indirect bonding of lingual brackets.
    Robles-Ruíz JJ; Ciamponi AL; Medeiros IS; Kanashiro LK
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1068-73. PubMed ID: 24813325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding agent.
    Ali H; Maroli S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):650-4. PubMed ID: 23250169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical acceptability of two self-etch adhesive resins for the bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Schnebel B; Mateer S; Maganzini AL; Freeman K
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 23269689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.