These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10420423)
1. Staging of malignant cutaneous wounds: a pilot study. Haisfield-Wolfe ME; Baxendale-Cox LM Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 Jul; 26(6):1055-64. PubMed ID: 10420423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Staging and defining characteristics of pressure ulcers using photographs by staff nurses in acute care settings. Jesada EC; Warren JI; Goodman D; Iliuta RW; Thurkauf G; McLaughlin MK; Johnson JE; Strassner L J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 23466719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability of digital imaging in the remote assessment of wounds: defining a standard. Murphy RX; Bain MA; Wasser TE; Wilson E; Okunski WJ Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Apr; 56(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 16557079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK). Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers. Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Toronto Symptom Assessment System for Wounds: a new clinical and research tool. Maida V; Ennis M; Kuziemsky C Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Oct; 22(10):468-74. PubMed ID: 20026922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wound staging: can nurses apply classroom education to the clinical setting? Arnold N; Watterworth B Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Jun; 41(5):40-4. PubMed ID: 7612139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part I: development and pilot testing. Berry DL; Trigg LJ; Lober WB; Karras BT; Galligan ML; Austin-Seymour M; Martin S Oncol Nurs Forum; 2004 Sep; 31(5):E75-83. PubMed ID: 15378104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The malignant wound assessment tool: a validation study using a Delphi approach. Schulz V; Kozell K; Biondo PD; Stiles C; Martins L; Tonkin K; Hagen NA Palliat Med; 2009 Apr; 23(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 19318462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes and patient-based hearing status in conductive hearing loss. Stewart MG Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 2 Suppl 98):1-21. PubMed ID: 11802001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A computer assisted diagnosis tool for the classification of burns by depth of injury. Serrano C; Acha B; Gómez-Cía T; Acha JI; Roa LM Burns; 2005 May; 31(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15774281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter- and intra-observer (dis)agreement among nurses and doctors to classify colour and exudation of open surgical wounds according to the Red-Yellow-Black scheme. Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1270-7. PubMed ID: 17584345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system. Bowling FL; King L; Fadavi H; Paterson JA; Preece K; Daniel RW; Matthews DJ; Boulton AJ Diabet Med; 2009 Jan; 26(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19125768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization and quantification of the skin radiance through new digital image analysis. Baret M; Bensimon N; Coronel S; Ventura S; Nicolas-Garcia S; Korichi R; Gazano G Skin Res Technol; 2006 Nov; 12(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 17026656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional documentation of wound healing: first results of a new objective method for measurement. Körber A; Rietkötter J; Grabbe S; Dissemond J J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2006 Oct; 4(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 17010174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wound status evaluation using color image processing. Hansen GL; Sparrow EM; Kokate JY; Leland KJ; Iaizzo PA IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Feb; 16(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 9050410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image analysis of chronic wounds for determining the surface area. Papazoglou ES; Zubkov L; Mao X; Neidrauer M; Rannou N; Weingarten MS Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 20492631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds. Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of screening for high-risk age-related macular degeneration with an Internet-based automated fundus camera. Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 15957480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]